IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v43y1996i4p549-561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost allocation in continuous‐review inventory models

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce C. Hartman
  • Moshe Dror

Abstract

A centralized inventory system serves a number of stores with common ownership, and thus reliable and timely information sharing. Each of them pays a share of the inventory cost, and the reward structure leaves the owners of individual stores rewarded for their individual performance. Appropriate selection of a cost allocation method is important if such a centralized system is to last. In this work we propose three necessary criteria—stability (core of a related cooperative game), justifiability (consistency of benefits with costs), and polynomial computability. For a concrete example we demonstrate that common allocation procedures may not meet all three tests, and we present a method that that meets all three criteria. This kind of cost allocation analysis helps the common management to evaluate the trade‐offs in choosing an allocation scheme for the cost of inventory centralization. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce C. Hartman & Moshe Dror, 1996. "Cost allocation in continuous‐review inventory models," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 549-561, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:4:p:549-561
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199606)43:43.0.CO;2-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199606)43:43.0.CO;2-7
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199606)43:43.0.CO;2-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiahua Zhang & Shu-Cherng Fang & Yifan Xu, 2018. "Inventory centralization with risk-averse newsvendors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 215-237, September.
    2. M. Mosquera & I. García-Jurado & M. Fiestras-Janeiro, 2008. "A note on coalitional manipulation and centralized inventory management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 183-188, February.
    3. M Dror & B C Hartman, 2011. "Survey of cooperative inventory games and extensions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 565-580, April.
    4. Ozen, U. & Norde, H.W. & Slikker, M., 2005. "On the Convexity of News Vendor Games," Other publications TiSEM 2faeeb88-8d0b-4c36-9b08-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Shoshana Anily & Moshe Haviv, 2010. "Cooperation in Service Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 660-673, June.
    6. Flip Klijn & Marco Slikker, 2004. "Distribution Center Consolidation Games," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 602.04, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    7. Feng, Hairong & Zeng, Yinlian & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Qian, Qian & Zhou, Yongwu, 2021. "Altruistic profit allocation rules for joint replenishment with carbon cap-and-trade policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 956-967.
    8. Frank Karsten & Marco Slikker & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2012. "Inventory pooling games for expensive, low‐demand spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(5), pages 311-324, August.
    9. Mahesh Nagarajan & Greys Sošić & Chunyang Tong, 2019. "Dynamic Stable Supplier Coalitions and Invariance in Assembly Systems with Commodity Components," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1269-1282, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:4:p:549-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.