IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v29y1982i4p617-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical analysis of the general linear model for lanchester ‐ type combat between two homogeneous forces

Author

Listed:
  • James G. Taylor

Abstract

This paper studies Lanchester‐type combat between two homogeneous forces modeled by the so‐called general linear model with continuous replacements/withdrawals. It demonstrates that this model can be transformed into a simpler canonical form, which is also shown to arise from fixed‐force‐level‐breakpoint battles modeled by Lanchester‐type equations for modern warfare. Analytical expressions for the force levels for the general variable coefficient linear model with continuous replacements/withdrawals are constructed out of so‐called general Lanchester functions for the model without replacements/withdrawals, for which all solutions are shown to be nonoscillatory in the strict sense. These force‐level results are unfortunately so complicated and opaque that the constant‐coefficient version of the model must be studied before any insights into the dynamics of combat may be analytically obtained. Thus, fairly complete results are given for the general linear model with constant attrition‐rate coefficients and constant rates of replacement/withdrawal. However, the expressions for the force levels are still so complicated that we have not been able to develop battle‐outcome prediction conditions directly from them alone but have had to establish general results on the qualitative behavior of solutions. A significant result (and one that greatly complicates the prediction of battle outcome) is that all solutions to the model with replacements/withdrawals are no longer necessarily nonoscillatory in the strict sense, i.e., both sides force levels can take on negative values if the force‐on‐force attrition equations are not “turned off” at the right time. Thus, this paper shows that the addition of continuous replacements/withdrawals to a Lanchester‐type model may significantly change the qualitative behavior of the force‐level trajectories. Battle‐outcome prediction conditions are nevertheless given, and important insights into the dynamics of combat are briefly indicated.

Suggested Citation

  • James G. Taylor, 1982. "Theoretical analysis of the general linear model for lanchester ‐ type combat between two homogeneous forces," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 617-633, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:29:y:1982:i:4:p:617-633
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800290409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800290409
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800290409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:29:y:1982:i:4:p:617-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.