IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v26y1979i2p365-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some simple victory‐prediction conditions for lanchester‐type combat between two homogeneous forces with supporting fires

Author

Listed:
  • James G. Taylor

Abstract

This paper develops new “simple” victory‐prediction conditions for a linear Lanchester‐type model of combat between two homogeneous forces with superimposed effects of supporting fires not subject to attrition. These simple victory‐prediction conditions involve only the initial conditions of battle and certain assumptions about the nature of temporal variations in the attrition‐rate coefficients. They are developed for a fixed‐force‐ratio‐breakpoint battle by studying the force‐ratio equation for the linear combat model. An important consideration is shown to be required for developing such simple victory‐prediction conditions: victory is not guaranteed in a fixed‐force‐ratio‐breakpoint battle even when the force ratio is always changing to the advantage of one of the combatants. One must specify additional conditions to hold for the cumulative fire effectivenesses of the primary weapon systems in order to develop correct victory‐prediction conditions. The inadequacy of previous victory‐prediction results is explained by examining (for the linear combat model without the supporting fires) new “exact” victory‐prediction conditions, which show that even the range of possible battle outcomes may be significantly different for variable‐coefficient and constant‐coefficients models.

Suggested Citation

  • James G. Taylor, 1979. "Some simple victory‐prediction conditions for lanchester‐type combat between two homogeneous forces with supporting fires," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 365-375, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:26:y:1979:i:2:p:365-375
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800260216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800260216
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800260216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:26:y:1979:i:2:p:365-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.