IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v21y1974i1p155-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development and evaluation of a cost‐based composite scheduling rule

Author

Listed:
  • Sumer C. Aggarwal
  • Bruce A. McCarl

Abstract

A cost‐based composite scheduling rule is developed and evaluated in comparison with three other well‐researched scheduling rules—SPT, S/OPN, and SST. This cost rule permits the optimization of more than one performance measure at a time. The priority number that is used for scheduling operations through each machine group is based on four separate performance measures—(1) In‐process Inventory, (2) Facilities Utilization, (3) Lateness, and (4) Mean Setup Time. The factorial experimental design involved three factor levels of loads, three factor levels of cost, and three factor levels of mean time. Analysis of variance was performed on each of the five output measures to study the effects of each of the three factors on each individual rule. Rank‐order comparisons between rules were also made; and, finally, general conclusions with regard to the effectiveness and flexibility of the Cost Rule were drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumer C. Aggarwal & Bruce A. McCarl, 1974. "The development and evaluation of a cost‐based composite scheduling rule," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 155-169, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:21:y:1974:i:1:p:155-169
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800210111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800210111
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800210111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:21:y:1974:i:1:p:155-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.