IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v44y2023i8p4621-4636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing decision making and coordination of a dual‐channel supply chain considering online reviews and channel preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao‐Jie Xu
  • Yong Liu
  • Wen‐Wen Ren
  • Jeffrey Yi‐Lin Forrest

Abstract

Many problems regarding channel conflicts exist in the pricing process of a manufacturer‐led dual‐channel supply chain. By considering the fact that online reviews and channel preferences are the important factors that influence consumer purchasing behaviors and the decision‐making of the supply chain, this paper deals with these problems through the development of a model involving online reviews and channel preferences. It then analyzes optimal decisions under either decentralized or centralized decision‐making scenarios. The impact of online review service input and consumer channel preference on optimal supply chain decisions and profits is further analyzed. Finally, based on the developed model, a revenue sharing contract coordination scheme is designed to achieve Pareto improvements in the supply chain. The results show that the degree of consumer preference for online channels affects the best consumer decisions and the overall profit of the supply chain. The impact coefficient of online reviews is positively correlated with the manufacturer's direct selling price, the level of input to online review services, and the profit of the entire supply chain. The provision of online review services can significantly increase channel prices, market sales, and profits compared to channel preferences. The overall profit of the supply chain under centralized decision‐making is significantly greater than that under decentralized decision‐making, and the coordination model can effectively coordinate the supply chain and alleviate conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao‐Jie Xu & Yong Liu & Wen‐Wen Ren & Jeffrey Yi‐Lin Forrest, 2023. "Pricing decision making and coordination of a dual‐channel supply chain considering online reviews and channel preferences," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4621-4636, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:8:p:4621-4636
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3974
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:8:p:4621-4636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.