This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Extending the lessons of laboratory experiments on tax compliance to managerial and decision economics Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics James Alm (University of Colorado at Boulder, Department of Economics, Campus Box 256, Boulder, CO 80309-0256, USA)
Michael McKee (University of New Mexico, Department of Economics, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA)
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
In this paper we examine what experiments on tax compliance have revealed about compliance behavior, and we discuss what these experiments can reveal about managerial and decision economics. We draw two general conclusions from this discussion. First, compliance is a complicated decision, one that depends upon the financial incentives facing the decision-maker, including detection and punishment, but one that also depends upon many other factors that have not been considered by the standard economics-of-crime paradigm. Second, and as a consequence, broader approaches to the compliance decision are needed, ones that involve enforcement but that also encompass more complete models of behavior. Put differently, any company strategy based only on detection and punishment may well be a reasonable starting point for compliance but not a good ending point. Instead, what is needed is a multi-faceted approach that emphasizes enforcement, but that also emphasizes the broad range of motivations that explain why people obey rules and regulations. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download . To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Article provided by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in its journal Managerial and Decision Economics .
Volume (Year): 19 (1998)
Issue (Month): 4-5 ()
Pages: 259-275
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:19:y:1998:i:4-5:p:259-275Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Cadsby, C. B. & Song, Fei. & Tapon, F., .
"Are You Paying Your Employees to Cheat? An Experimental Investigation ,"
Working Papers
2008-10, University of Guelph, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
James J. Murphy & John K. Stranlund, 2005.
"A Laboratory Investigation of Compliance Behavior under Tradable Emissions Rights: Implications for Targeted Enforcement ,"
Working Papers
2005-1, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Resource Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Timothy N. Cason & Lata Gangadharan, 2004.
"An Experimental Study of Compliance and Leverage in Auditing and Regulatory Enforcement ,"
Department of Economics - Working Papers Series
918, The University of Melbourne.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? About five million pdf files are downloaded through RePEc every year.
This page was last updated on 2009-11-1.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .