IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v6y1987i3p328-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new typology for R&D laboratories: Implications for policy analysts

Author

Listed:
  • Michael M. Crow
  • Barry L. Bozeman

Abstract

Science policy analysts have traditionally classified R&D laboratories as government, private, or university. The authors argue that this view is outmoded and provides little help in understanding the rapidly changing environment of R&D laboratories. They provide and test an alternative scheme designed to cope with “sector blurring” and the intermingling of market and political influences on R&D laboratories. The authors also discuss implications of their scheme for a variety of contemporary science policy issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael M. Crow & Barry L. Bozeman, 1987. "A new typology for R&D laboratories: Implications for policy analysts," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(3), pages 328-341.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:6:y:1987:i:3:p:328-341
    DOI: 10.2307/3324847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3324847
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/3324847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Einar Rasmussen & Paul Benneworth & Magnus Gulbrandsen, 2013. "Scoping paper: Developing University Innovation Capacity: How can innovation policy effectively harness universities’ capability to promote high-growth technology businesses?," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20131007, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    2. Einar Rasmussen & Paul Benneworth & Magnus Gulbrandsen, 2015. "How academic entrepreneurship meets the university," CHEPS Working Papers 201511, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
    3. Tucci, Christopher L. (Christopher Luigi) & Cusumano, Michael A., 1954-, 1994. "Benefits and pitfalls of international strategic technology alliances," Working papers 3706-94. WP (Internationa, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Mario Coccia, 2018. "How do public research labs use funding for research? A case study," Papers 1805.11932, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:6:y:1987:i:3:p:328-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.