IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v4y1984i3p325-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cotton dust regulation: An OSHA success story?

Author

Listed:
  • W. Kip Viscusi

Abstract

In 1978, OSHA took a major step in attempting to promote the health of workers in the textile industry, tightening its standard on cotton dust levels in textile plants. Because the OSHA cotton dust standard was widely believed to be ineffective, it became the target of a major political debate and a fundamental U.S. Supreme Court decision. The evidence indicates that the standard has had the expected beneficial effect on worker health, and at a cost much lower than originally anticipated. Nevertheless, the costs still remain very high, far higher than estimates of the value of the results they achieve or of the value that workers place on them. Moreover, much more efficient ways of achieving comparable results are available. Nevertheless, large firms in the industry now appear to have a vested interest in maintaining the standard in its original form and are unlikely to constitute a force for change.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Kip Viscusi, 1984. "Cotton dust regulation: An OSHA success story?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(3), pages 325-343.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:4:y:1984:i:3:p:325-343
    DOI: 10.2307/3324188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/3324188
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/3324188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:4:y:1984:i:3:p:325-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.