IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i3-4p406-414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of the fall risk perception questionnaire for patients in acute care hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Jieun Choi
  • Se Min Choi
  • Jeong Sin Lee
  • Soon Seok Seo
  • Ja Yeon Kim
  • Hye Young Kim
  • Sung Reul Kim

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to develop a fall risk perception questionnaire for patients admitted to acute care hospitals and to establish its reliability and validity. Background To prevent falls during patients’ hospitalisation, it is essential for them to accurately perceive their risk of falling. Design This methodological study was performed to develop a fall risk perception questionnaire. Methods After generating a preliminary questionnaire, two rounds of content validity testing were performed with nine experts. Following a pilot test, a convenience sample of 236 participants was recruited from an acute care hospital between 2 May 2018 and 15 December 2019. Construct, convergent and known‐group validity of the questionnaire was evaluated, and reliability was estimated by calculating the internal consistency reliability coefficients. The study adhered to STROBE guidelines. Results Exploratory factor analysis yielded a three‐factor solution with 27 items. The questionnaire showed statistically significant positive correlation with the Korean Falls Efficacy Scale‐International and the Morse Fall Scale, thus establishing convergent validity. For known‐group comparison, Morse Fall Scale scores were categorised into two groups by cut‐off score. The risk for falls group had a significantly higher perceived fall risk than the no risk for falls group, thus establishing known‐group validity. Cronbach's alpha values indicated good to excellent reliability for the overall questionnaire with 27 items and for each of the three subfactors. Conclusions The fall risk perception questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity in an acute care hospital setting. Relevance to clinical practice Because understanding patients’ perceptions of their fall risk is essential for preventing falls, it is necessary to regularly assess patients’ fall risk perception using tools with established reliability and validity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieun Choi & Se Min Choi & Jeong Sin Lee & Soon Seok Seo & Ja Yeon Kim & Hye Young Kim & Sung Reul Kim, 2021. "Development and validation of the fall risk perception questionnaire for patients in acute care hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 406-414, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:406-414
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15550
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:406-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.