IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i9-10p1684-1694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Williams
  • Georgia Griffin
  • Victoria Farrell
  • Yvonne L. Hauck

Abstract

Aim and objectives To gain insight into the supportive care needs of Western Australian women experiencing gynaecological cancer. Background Meeting the supportive care needs of people living with cancer is becoming increasingly important as advances in cancer treatment contribute to growing numbers of survivors. International evidence suggests between 24%–56% of women with gynaecological cancer have unmet supportive care needs and that psychological challenges, information provision and holistic care are priorities. No qualitative investigation has previously explored women's journey of gynaecological cancer within the Australian setting. Design A qualitative descriptive design was used. Methods Women treated for gynaecological cancer were recruited from a tertiary public women's hospital in Western Australia. Thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data collected from 190 women over 12 months through written open‐ended survey responses and telephone interviews. The COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guided presentation of results. Results Analysis yielded five themes and four subthemes: (a) Communication style directs the experience (subthemes: feeling supported; absence of empathy); (b) It's not just about the disease (subthemes: life has changed; holistic care); (c) A desire for information; (d) Drawing upon resilience; and (e) Navigating the system. Discussion Exploration of the women's needs leads to the discussion of three concepts. Communication styles, harnessing women's resilience and alternative models of care are evaluated for their capacity to improve care and women's quality of life into survivorship. Recommendations are made for further research and possible interventions that can be translated into the clinical setting. Conclusion Women with gynaecological cancer described complex often unmet supportive care needs and interactions with the healthcare system. Insight gained directs suggestions for improved service provision. Relevance to clinical practice Improved patient‐centred communication, harnessing resilience as a resource and alternative models of care for follow‐up are encouraged as areas of improvement for clinicians and care services.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Williams & Georgia Griffin & Victoria Farrell & Yvonne L. Hauck, 2020. "Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1684-1694, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:9-10:p:1684-1694
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15221
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zenobia Chan & Carmen Kan & Patrick Lee & Isabel Chan & Joyce Lam, 2012. "A systematic review of qualitative studies: patients’ experiences of preoperative communication," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 812-824, March.
    2. Memnun Seven & Eda Sahin & Sakine Yilmaz & Aygul Akyuz, 2016. "Palliative care needs of patients with gynaecologic cancer," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3152-3159, November.
    3. Olivia Cook & Meredith McIntyre & Katrina Recoche, 2015. "Exploration of the role of specialist nurses in the care of women with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 683-695, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pär Salander & Joakim Isaksson & Brith Granström & Göran Laurell, 2016. "Motives that head and neck cancer patients have for contacting a specialist nurse – an empirical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3160-3166, November.
    2. Mei‐Ling Lin & Chuen‐Teng Huang & Ching‐Huey Chen, 2017. "Reasons for family involvement in elective surgical decision‐making in Taiwan: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1969-1977, July.
    3. Katja Schubert Samuelsson & Monika Egenvall & Inga Klarin & Johan Lökk & Ulf Gunnarsson & Marie Iwarzon, 2018. "The older patient's experience of the healthcare chain and information when undergoing colorectal cancer surgery according to the enhanced recovery after surgery concept," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1580-1588, April.
    4. Andrea Kobleder & Hanna Mayer & Larissa Gehrig & Beate Senn, 2017. "“Promoting continuity of care”—Specialist nurses’ role experiences in gynaecological oncology: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4890-4898, December.
    5. Tonje Sibbern & Vibeke Bull Sellevold & Simen A Steindal & Craig Dale & Judy Watt‐Watson & Alfhild Dihle, 2017. "Patients’ experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1172-1188, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:9-10:p:1684-1694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.