IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i23-24p4653-4673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritisation of diabetes‐related footcare amongst primary care healthcare professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Leanne Mullan
  • Karen Wynter
  • Andrea Driscoll
  • Bodil Rasmussen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess primary healthcare professionals’ priority for managing diabetic foot disease (DFD) over the progressive course of the condition compared to other aspects of diabetes care. Background DFD affects up to 60 million people globally. Evidence suggests that comprehensive preventative footcare may reduce serious complications of DFD, such as amputation. Design A cross‐sectional quantitative study reported according to STROBE statement. Methods General Practitioners (GPs) and Credentialled Diabetes Educators (CDEs) working within Australian primary care were invited to complete an online survey, to obtain information about preventative and early intervention footcare priorities and practices. Ten GPs and 84 CDEs completed the survey. Results On diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) review was identified to be one of the top three priorities of care by 57 (61%) of participants whilst at 20‐year history of diabetes 73 (78%) participants indicated its priority. Foot assessments became a priority for 78% (n = 73) of participants and podiatry referrals a priority for 53% (n = 50) of participants only when a “foot concern” was raised. Referrals to specialist high‐risk foot podiatrists or services were a first priority for 56% (n = 53), when the person had significant amputation risk factors. Conclusion Diabetes‐related preventative footcare assessments and management remain a low priority amongst primary healthcare professionals. Preventative care for asymptomatic complications, such as DFD, may be overlooked in favour of monitoring HbA1c or medication management. Limited prioritisation of footcare in primary care is concerning given the risks for amputation associated with DFD. Relevance to clinical practice This study reveals the need for primary healthcare decision makers and clinicians to ensure preventative footcare is a focused priority earlier in the diabetes care continuum. Collaborative and widespread promotion of the importance of proactive rather than reactive footcare practices is required to support prevention of foot ulcers and amputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Leanne Mullan & Karen Wynter & Andrea Driscoll & Bodil Rasmussen, 2020. "Prioritisation of diabetes‐related footcare amongst primary care healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4653-4673, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4653-4673
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15506
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4653-4673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.