IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i23-24p4614-4622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey of nurses’ knowledge and practice regarding medication administration using enteral tubes

Author

Listed:
  • Harry Tillott
  • Diane Barrett
  • Jingjing Ruan
  • Vincent Li
  • Susan Merrick
  • Helen Steed
  • Hana Morrissey
  • Patrick Anthony Ball

Abstract

Aim and objectives To identify the practice variation of the individual practitioners in medications’ formulation modification for patients using enteral feeding tubing and to support health practitioners involved in this process. Background Blockage of enteral tubes is a common problem that can sometimes be resolved but may require replacement of the tube. Medications are a common culprit. Design A survey of 73 registered nurses’ practices around medication administration via enteral feeding tubes. Methods A questionnaire study was undertaken within a district general hospital across a broad variety of wards to explore nurses’ experiences of medication administration via enteral tubes. The study is reported in accordance with the squire 2.0 guidelines from the EQUATOR network. Results Seventy‐three nurses responded. Twenty‐six per cent reported never checking about drug modification for administration via a tube, 12% check every time and 61% when unsure about a new drug. The volume of fluid flushes administered after medication ranged from 7.5–150 ml. Seventy‐one per cent of participants reported stopping feed when medications are required, varying from 1–60 min. Sixty per cent had experienced a blocked tube and 52% the tube being removed for these reasons. The clinical nurse specialist was the commonest first point of call to help. Staff named 15 medications as the most problematic to administer, lactulose and omeprazole were the top two. Conclusions Practice varies significantly amongst nurses around medication administration. Theoretically, this may contribute to blocked tubes and excessive fluid administration to some patients. Barriers to medication administration were thematically grouped into: time, difficulty modifying medication, medication interactions and knowledge. Areas identified to support staff include training, devices to crush medications, medication suitability, multidisciplinary approach to streamline care and quick reference guides. Relevance to clinical practice Health professionals may use these results to reduce and ultimately avoid problems with administering medications through feeding tubes. Organisations may use these results to develop their local practice pathways for prescribing, dispensing and training around administration of medications through enteral tubes. In a community setting, this paper may improve the awareness of patients, caregivers and prescribers of the possible implications of tubing blockages.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry Tillott & Diane Barrett & Jingjing Ruan & Vincent Li & Susan Merrick & Helen Steed & Hana Morrissey & Patrick Anthony Ball, 2020. "Survey of nurses’ knowledge and practice regarding medication administration using enteral tubes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4614-4622, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4614-4622
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4614-4622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.