IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i23-24p4573-4582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Swallowing screening practice patterns for nurses in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit

Author

Listed:
  • Justine Dallal York
  • Sarah Miller
  • Jennifer Chapin
  • Stephanie Gore
  • Eric I. Jeng
  • Emily K. Plowman

Abstract

Aims and objectives The current study surveyed nurse practice patterns for performing swallowing screens in an academic cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). It aimed to index: training and levels of confidence in conducting dysphagia screens; screening methods employed; timing and frequency of implement; and subsequent plan of care in identified high‐risk patients. Background Swallowing impairment (dysphagia) is common following cardiac surgery and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Early and accurate detection of dysphagia is therefore critical to afford implementation of interventions to optimise patient care. Currently, no validated instruments or guidelines exist for nursing screening of dysphagia in this setting. Methods An anonymous and voluntary 10‐item mixed‐methods online survey was conducted using Qualtrics software. Nonprobability purposive sampling was utilised to recruit nurses working in an academic 24‐bed cardiac ICU. Thematic analysis using operationally defined coding, SRQR checklist and descriptive statistics were employed. Results Sixty‐nine nurses completed the survey during a 1‐month period, representing an 84% response rate. Formal training in performing swallowing screens was reported in 18.6% of nurses. In rank order, reported level of confidence was the following: “moderately” (49%); “somewhat” (35%); “not” (13%); and “very” (3%). The majority of nurses performed screens within 1 hr (40.6%) or between 1–4 hr (43.8%) of extubation. Fifteen different methods were utilised to screen swallowing function by nurses who reported a total of 31 different clinical signs indicative of dysphagia. Conclusions Survey data of practicing nurses in an academic cardiac ICU revealed limited formal training in swallowing screening methodology, a high degree of variability in screening methods employed and low levels of agreement for dysphagia signs. Relevance to clinical practice Data highlight a knowledge gap and need for the development of formal education and validated rapid nursing dysphagia screening tools for standardised implementation in the cardiac surgery ICU setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Justine Dallal York & Sarah Miller & Jennifer Chapin & Stephanie Gore & Eric I. Jeng & Emily K. Plowman, 2020. "Swallowing screening practice patterns for nurses in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4573-4582, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4573-4582
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15490
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4573-4582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.