IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4379-4386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' influence on consumers' experience of safety in acute mental health units: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Ann Cutler
  • Jenny Sim
  • Elizabeth Halcomb
  • Lorna Moxham
  • Moira Stephens

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how nurses influence the perceptions and experience of safety among consumers who have been admitted to an acute mental health unit. Background Safety is a priority in acute mental health inpatient units, yet consumers do not always experience acute units as safe. Despite being primary stakeholders, little is known about what safety means for consumers in acute mental health units. Design A qualitative descriptive study informed by naturalistic enquiry was conducted and is reported using the COREQ checklist. Methods Fifteen consumers with experience of mental illness participated in semi‐structured individual interviews. These interviews explored what safety meant for them during their acute mental health unit admissions. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Findings The theme Influence of Nurses reflected that the way nurses engaged in acute mental health units had a profound impact on participants' sense of safety. Three sub‐themes emerged as follows: (a) Availability: “It's about nurses spending time with you”; (b) Being responsive: “They would listen if you had a concern”; and (c) Caring: “Little acts of kindness.” Conclusions These findings challenge the dominant discourse around safety in mental health organisations, in which nursing practice is often oriented towards the management of risk, rather than the promotion of safety. The findings demonstrate that, through their clinical practice, nurses can enhance consumers' feelings of safety in the acute mental health unit. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses play a key role in providing care within acute mental health units. It is vital that the behaviours and actions nurses can enact in order to promote feelings of safety among consumers in this setting are enabled at individual, unit and organisational levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Ann Cutler & Jenny Sim & Elizabeth Halcomb & Lorna Moxham & Moira Stephens, 2020. "Nurses' influence on consumers' experience of safety in acute mental health units: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4379-4386, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4379-4386
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15480
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosemary C Stenhouse, 2013. "‘Safe enough in here?’: patients' expectations and experiences of feeling safe in an acute psychiatric inpatient ward," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3109-3119, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalie Ann Cutler & Elizabeth Halcomb & Jenny Sim & Moira Stephens & Lorna Moxham, 2021. "How does the environment influence consumers' perceptions of safety in acute mental health units? A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 765-772, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Ann Cutler & Elizabeth Halcomb & Jenny Sim & Moira Stephens & Lorna Moxham, 2021. "How does the environment influence consumers' perceptions of safety in acute mental health units? A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 765-772, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4379-4386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.