IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i19-20p3774-3789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships between the National Early Warning Score 2, clinical worry and patient outcome at discharge: Retrospective observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Jee‐In Hwang
  • Ho Jun Chin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 and composite score for clinical worry in identifying patients at risk of clinical deterioration, and to determine relationships between National Early Warning Score 2, clinical worry score and patient outcome at discharge. Background The efficacy of early warning systems depends on patient population and care settings. Based on a theoretical framework on factors affecting clinical deterioration and patient outcomes, studies exploring the relationship between early warning systems and patient outcomes at discharge are sparse. Design Retrospective observational study. Methods A random sample of 732 medical records were reviewed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to evaluate predictive abilities regarding the events of unanticipated in‐hospital mortality, unplanned intensive care unit/ higher dependency bed admission and cardiac arrest. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine relationships between National Early Warning Score 2, clinical worry score and patient outcome. Reporting followed the STROBE checklist. Results National Early Warning Score 2 and clinical worry score significantly predicted the events within 24 hr of the assessment. After controlling for other patient, treatment and organisational characteristics, National Early Warning Score 2 was a significant factor associated with patient outcome, but clinical worry score was not. Specifically, patients at high risk based on National Early Warning Score 2 were less likely to have improved outcome. Conclusions National Early Warning Score 2 and clinical worry score performed well for predicting deteriorating condition of patients. National Early Warning Score 2 was significantly associated with patient outcome. It can be used for efficient patient management for safe, quality care. Relevance to clinical practice National Early Warning Score 2 can be used for early assessment of not only clinical deterioration but also patient outcome and provide timely intervention, when coupled with clinical worry score.

Suggested Citation

  • Jee‐In Hwang & Ho Jun Chin, 2020. "Relationships between the National Early Warning Score 2, clinical worry and patient outcome at discharge: Retrospective observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3774-3789, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3774-3789
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15408
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Spångfors & Gitte Bunkenborg & Mats Molt & Karin Samuelson, 2019. "The National Early Warning Score predicts mortality in hospital ward patients with deviating vital signs: A retrospective medical record review study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1216-1222, April.
    2. Luke Slawomirski & Ane Auraaen & Nicolaas S. Klazinga, 2017. "The economics of patient safety: Strengthening a value-based approach to reducing patient harm at national level," OECD Health Working Papers 96, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilal H. Alrahbi & Shamsa K. Al-Toqi & Sajini Sony & Nuha Al-Abri, 2021. "Assessment of Patient Safety Culture among Healthcare Providers," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 1-59, February.
    2. Alessandro Rizzi & Enrico Sorano & Stefano A. Cerrato & Federico Riganti & Alessandro Stiari & Ernesto Macrì & Alberto Sardi, 2021. "Civil Liability of Regional Health Services: The Case of the Piedmont Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Anja Geisler & Susanne Hedegaard & Tracey K. Bucknall, 2023. "Piloting a Nurse-Led Critical Care Outreach Service to Pre-Empt Medical Emergency Team Calls and Facilitate Staff Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Patricia S. Groves & Jacinda L. Bunch & Kirsten M. Hanrahan & Kathryn A. Sabadosa & Brittaney Sharp & Janet K. Williams, 2023. "Patient Voices in Hospital Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(1), pages 105-114, January.
    5. Chin-Yen Han & Chun-Chih Lin & Li-Chin Chen & Shou-Hsuan Liu & Suzanne Goopy & Wen Chang, 2022. "Family Caregivers’ Experiences of Preventing Harm to Older People during Hospitalization: A Phenomenographic Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Bernice Redley & Tim Baker, 2019. "Have you SCAND MMe Please? A framework to prevent harm during acute hospitalisation of older persons: A retrospective audit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 560-574, February.
    7. Francisco Miguel Escandell-Rico & Juana Perpiñá-Galvañ & Lucía Pérez-Fernández & Ángela Sanjuán-Quiles & Piedras Albas Gómez-Beltrán & Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo, 2021. "Nurses’ Perceptions on the Implementation of a Safe Drug Administration Protocol and Its Effect on Error Notification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-10, April.
    8. Musa Sani Kaware & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Mohd Nazri Shafei & Suhaily Mohd Hairon & Abduljaleel Umar Abdullahi, 2022. "Patient Safety Culture and Its Associated Factors: A Situational Analysis among Nurses in Katsina Public Hospitals, Northwest Nigeria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Joaquina Montilla-Herrador & José A. Lozano-Meca & Aitor Baño-Alcaraz & Carmen Lillo-Navarro & Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín & Mariano Gacto-Sánchez, 2022. "Knowledge and Attitudes towards Patient Safety among Students in Physical Therapy in Spain: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    10. María Teresa Segura-García & María Ángeles Castro Vida & Manuel García-Martin & Reyes Álvarez-Ossorio-García de Soria & Alda Elena Cortés-Rodríguez & María Mar López-Rodríguez, 2023. "Patient Safety Culture in a Tertiary Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Filip Haegdorens & Koenraad G. Monsieurs & Koen De Meester & Peter Van Bogaert, 2020. "The optimal threshold for prompt clinical review: An external validation study of the national early warning score," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4594-4603, December.
    12. Yasaman Parsia & Shahryar Sorooshian, 2020. "A Decision-Making Algorithm for Rearchitecting of Healthcare Facilities to Minimize Nosocomial Infections Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Rosemary Saunders & Karla Seaman & Renée Graham & Angela Christiansen, 2019. "The effect of volunteers’ care and support on the health outcomes of older adults in acute care: A systematic scoping review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4236-4249, December.
    14. Francesco De Micco & Anna De Benedictis & Vittorio Fineschi & Paola Frati & Massimo Ciccozzi & Leandro Pecchia & Rossana Alloni & Nicola Petrosillo & Simonetta Filippi & Giampaolo Ghilardi & Laura Leo, 2021. "From Syndemic Lesson after COVID-19 Pandemic to a “Systemic Clinical Risk Management” Proposal in the Perspective of the Ethics of Job Well Done," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-6, December.
    15. Yosuke Hatakeyama & Shigeru Fujita & Shuhei Iida & Yoji Nagai & Yoshiko Shimamori & Junko Ayuzawa & Tomohiro Hirao & Ryo Onishi & Kanako Seto & Kunichika Matsumoto & Tomonori Hasegawa, 2020. "Prioritization of patient safety health policies: Delphi survey using patient safety experts in Japan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Mari Liukka & Alison Steven & M Flores Vizcaya Moreno & Arja M Sara-aho & Jayden Khakurel & Pauline Pearson & Hannele Turunen & Susanna Tella, 2020. "Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Ling Jiang & Li Li & Lisa Lommel, 2020. "Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to pressure injury prevention: A large‐scale cross‐sectional survey in mainland China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3311-3324, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3774-3789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.