IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i15-16p3042-3053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of a multifaceted nurse‐led intervention in acute care hospitals aimed at reducing indwelling urinary catheter use: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Vicki Parker
  • Michelle Giles
  • Jennie King
  • Kamana Bantawa

Abstract

Background It is essential to evaluate the ways in which practice changes are implemented and received in and across contexts, identifying barriers and enablers, and mechanisms for enhancing success. Aim To provide insights into the experiences of clinicians in implementing a multifaceted bundled urinary catheter care intervention in four acute care hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Methods The catheter care bundle was implemented using a pre‐ and postintervention study design. The intervention was implemented in all adult inpatient wards, emergency departments and operating theatres of four hospitals. The bundle consisted of an integrated set of evidence‐based practices to assist clinicians in making better informed decisions related to catheter insertion, care and removal practices. Focus groups at each participating hospital evaluated the implementation processes from the clinicians’ perspective, identifying barriers and enablers to successful implementation. Results Eight focus groups were held with 35 participants. Four key inter‐related themes were identified: early and sustained engagement with key stakeholders; good planning but remaining flexible; managing the burden of practice change; and adopting and sustaining practice change. These themes capture and highlight the complexity and the challenges associated with implementation of the practice change across contexts and the project timeline. Conclusion It is imperative to understand the challenges associated with complex practice change and ways in which implementation can be optimised. This study identified barriers and enablers experienced by staff implementing the bundled intervention. The themes encapsulate factors central to success of practice change within the complex, multilayered healthcare environment. Relevance to clinical practice Key challenges highlight the need for forward planning, strategic engagement of key players, continuing monitoring and feedback together with adequate resourcing tailored to result in sustainable normalisation of the intervention over time. The COREQ checklist for qualitative studies has been used in reporting this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicki Parker & Michelle Giles & Jennie King & Kamana Bantawa, 2020. "Barriers and facilitators to implementation of a multifaceted nurse‐led intervention in acute care hospitals aimed at reducing indwelling urinary catheter use: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 3042-3053, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:3042-3053
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:3042-3053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.