IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i15-16p2897-2906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring pairing of new graduate nurses with mentors: An interpretive descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Devey Burry
  • Dawn Stacey
  • Chantal Backman
  • Magda B.L. Donia
  • Michelle Lalonde

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To explore mentorship pairing practices for new graduate nurses in a tertiary care hospital. Background Many organisations have implemented mentorship transition programmes to decrease new nursing graduate turnover in the first two years of practice. Little is known about mentorship pairing processes. Design An interpretive descriptive qualitative study was conducted in a multicampus academic health science centre in Ontario, Canada. The COREQ reporting guideline was used. Methods Thirty‐one semistructured interviews were conducted from July 2018–July 2019 in a multicampus academic health science centre with new nursing graduates, experienced nurses and nurse leaders who participated in the New Graduate Guarantee programme or were involved in the mentor–mentee pairing process in 2016 or 2017. Data collected were analysed using thematic analysis within the groups and triangulated across groups. Results Neither the new graduates nor the mentors were aware of the pairing processes. Nursing leaders relied on their knowledge of the participants to pair new graduates and mentors with many stating participants’ personalities were considered. New graduates and mentors described making an initial connection and socialisation as important themes related to facilitating the pairing process. Organisational influences on pairing included taking breaks together, the location of the final student placement, and the management of workload and scheduling. Conclusions Increased awareness and transparency regarding nursing mentorship pairing processes is required. Pairing processes suggested by participants warrant further investigation to determine efficacy. Relevance Findings reinforce the need to discuss and research nursing specific mentorship pairing processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Devey Burry & Dawn Stacey & Chantal Backman & Magda B.L. Donia & Michelle Lalonde, 2020. "Exploring pairing of new graduate nurses with mentors: An interpretive descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2897-2906, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:2897-2906
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15360
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ching-Yuan Huang & Tsung-Chin Wu & Rhay-Hung Weng & Chiu- Hsia Hung & Tzu-En Lin & Yu-Chen Tsai, 2023. "Developing and Testing the Negative Mentoring Experience Questionnaire (NMEQ) for Nurses," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:2897-2906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.