IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i1-2p119-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oral anticancer therapy project: Clinical utility of a specific home care nursing programme on behalf of Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Cirillo
  • Luciano Carlucci
  • Lorenzo Legramandi
  • Editta Baldini
  • Cosimo Sacco
  • Vittorina Zagonel
  • Silvana Leo
  • Francesca Di Fabio
  • Giuseppe Tonini
  • Maria Luisa Meacci
  • Alfredo Tartarone
  • Daniele Farci
  • Giampaolo Tortora
  • Marta Zaninelli
  • Vanna Maria Valori
  • Saverio Cinieri
  • Francesco Carrozza
  • Enrico Barbato
  • Valentina Fabbroni
  • Elisabetta Cretella
  • Teresa Gamucci
  • Gianluigi Lunardi
  • Sonia Zamboni
  • Giovanni Micallo
  • Stefano Cascinu
  • Carmine Pinto
  • Stefania Gori

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the effectiveness of a specific home care nursing programme in addition to standard care in patients (pts) receiving oral anticancer treatments. Background Oral anticancer therapy present challenges for pts since treatment is a home‐based therapy. This study evaluates the potentiality of a home care nursing programme in decreasing hospital accesses for not severe toxicity. Methods This is an open‐label, multicentre, randomised trial including pts who were receiving an anticancer oral drug. The study complies with the CONSORT checklist published in 2010. Concomitant use of radiation therapy, intravenous or metronomic therapies, or the intake of previous oral drugs was not allowed. Pts were randomly assigned to home care nursing programme (A) or standard care (B). In arm A, dedicated nurses provided information to pts, a daily record on which pts would take note of drugs and dosages and a telephone monitoring during the first two cycles of therapy. The primary outcome was the reduction in improper hospital accesses for grade 1–2 toxicity according to CTCAE v4.0. Results Out of 432 randomised pts, 378 were analysed (184 pts in arm A and 194 in arm B). Hospital accesses were observed in 41 pts in arm A and in 42 pts in arm B (22.3% vs. 21.6%, respectively). No difference was detected in proportion of improper accesses between arm A and arm B (29.3% vs. 23.8%, respectively). Conclusions Our experience failed to support the role of a specific home care nursing programme for pts taking oral chemotherapy. An improved attention to specific educational practice and information offered to pts can explain these results. Relevance to clinical practice Our results underline the role of nurse educational practice and information offered to patients. A careful nurse information of patients about drugs is essential to reduce toxicities avoiding the opportunity of a specific home monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Cirillo & Luciano Carlucci & Lorenzo Legramandi & Editta Baldini & Cosimo Sacco & Vittorina Zagonel & Silvana Leo & Francesca Di Fabio & Giuseppe Tonini & Maria Luisa Meacci & Alfredo Tartaron, 2020. "Oral anticancer therapy project: Clinical utility of a specific home care nursing programme on behalf of Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1-2), pages 119-129, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:1-2:p:119-129
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15064
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:1-2:p:119-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.