IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i5-6p902-911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The associations of workload, individual and organisational factors on nurses’ occupational injuries

Author

Listed:
  • Majid Bagheri Hosseinabadi
  • Narges Khanjani
  • Siavash Etemadinezhad
  • Seyed Ehsan Samaei
  • Mehdi Raadabadi
  • Maryam Mostafaee

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the prevalence and type of occupational injuries in nurses and their associations with workload, working shift, and nurses’ individual and organisational factors. Background Nurses are vulnerable to occupational injuries due to the nature of their job. Design A cross‐sectional correlational design (based on STROBE Statement) was conducted. Methods This study was conducted among 616 nurses of four public hospitals located in four different provinces in Iran. Data were collected using three questionnaires including an organisational and demographic questionnaire, an occupational injuries checklist and the NASA‐TLX questionnaire (about mental workload). Chi‐square test, one‐way ANOVA and multivariate logistic regression were used in SPSS version 23.0 for statistical analysis. Results Blood and body fluid exposures had the highest prevalence (47.4%) among all injuries. Needlestick injuries showed a significant relation with gender, age, number of shifts in a month and work experience. With increase in mental workload, needlestick injuries increase by 35%. Also, injuries reported by nurses working in rotating shifts were 15%–53% more than nurses working in fixed shifts. Conclusion Working in rotating shifts and work overload was significantly related to all injuries. Decreasing nurses’ mental workload, introducing guidelines and efficient training in shift work schedules can help decrease occupational injuries among nurses. Relevance to clinical practice In order to reduce occupational injuries among nurses, in addition to incorporating advanced management and technology, it is necessary to pay attention to psychosocial, individual and organisational risk factors related to occupational injuries and their frequency in nurses. Also, reducing personnel's mental and occupational pressure should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Majid Bagheri Hosseinabadi & Narges Khanjani & Siavash Etemadinezhad & Seyed Ehsan Samaei & Mehdi Raadabadi & Maryam Mostafaee, 2019. "The associations of workload, individual and organisational factors on nurses’ occupational injuries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 902-911, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:902-911
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14699
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:902-911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.