IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i19-20p3599-3609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The risk factors of antenatal depression: A cross‐sectional survey

Author

Listed:
  • Jiarui Chen
  • Wendy M. Cross
  • Virginia Plummer
  • Louisa Lam
  • Mei Sun
  • Chunxiang Qin
  • Siyuan Tang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the prevalence of depression in the third trimester of pregnancy and identify the related demographic risk factors. Background Antenatal depression as a disabling and treatable disease has a wide‐ranging impact on perinatal women and has received extensive attention from researchers. Design A cross‐sectional survey was conducted at three public hospitals. Methods Demographic questionnaire was developed from the literature review, and depression was assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. A binary logistic regression model was used to assess the association between depression and demographic predictors. STROBE checklist for cross‐sectional studies was applied in this paper (see Appendix S1). Result A total of 773 pregnant women participated in the study. 29.6% of participants scored more than 9 points on Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. In the final logistic model, living in rural area, marital satisfaction, assisted reproductive technology, lacking of prenatal health knowledge and life events were strongly significantly associated with antenatal depression. Moreover, living in an extended family, without Medicare insurance, unemployed, working as civil servants or healthcare workers, and lower household income also predicted antenatal depression. However, education level, smoking or drinking before pregnancy was found not to be associated with antenatal depression. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the prevalence of antenatal depression was high. Satisfied with the current marital status, pregnancy without assisted reproductive technology, knowledge of perinatal care and no life events recently were considered as the protective factors for antenatal depression. Relevance to clinical practice Antenatal psychological interventions should focus on how to improve the marital satisfaction and the relationship with their family members. More attentions should be paid to the women who have had some life events recently or received assisted reproductive technology for pregnancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiarui Chen & Wendy M. Cross & Virginia Plummer & Louisa Lam & Mei Sun & Chunxiang Qin & Siyuan Tang, 2019. "The risk factors of antenatal depression: A cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3599-3609, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3599-3609
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14955
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14955?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Urbano L França & Michael L McManus, 2018. "Frequency, trends, and antecedents of severe maternal depression after three million U.S. births," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiwon Oh & Sukhee Ahn, 2022. "Predictors of Antenatal Depression in Pregnant Couples," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(5), pages 881-890, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandraluz Lara-Cinisomo & Julio Ricardo Loret de Mola & Kendra Flores-Carter & Karen M. Tabb & Kristina Roloff, 2022. "Prenatal Depressive Symptoms, Self-Rated Health, and Diabetes Self-Efficacy: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3599-3609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.