IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i11-12p2046-2060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal health outcomes for incarcerated women: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Martha Jane Paynter
  • Emily K. Drake
  • Christine Cassidy
  • Erna Snelgrove‐Clarke

Abstract

Aims and objectives To inform a systematic synthesis of what is known about the maternal health outcomes of incarcerated women, this scoping review uses a theoretical framework of intersectional feminism. Background Despite rising imprisonment of women, there is a lack of research, from a feminist perspective, on perinatal health outcomes among incarcerated women. Design Systematic scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Methods In consultation with a medical research librarian, key databases and journals were searched for English and French‐language articles published up to February 2018. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts to identify articles for full‐text review. Study quality was appraised using the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The study adheres to PRISMA‐EQUATOR guidelines. Results Forty‐five studies met the preset criteria and were reviewed in full text. In addition, 13 studies met consensus for inclusion. Method, setting, participants, sample, relevant outcomes and relevant findings were extracted from each study for synthesis. Included studies had varied methods and were published from 1989–2014. Participants included women imprisoned during the perinatal period up to six months postpartum. All studies were conducted in carceral contexts, with 12 based in the USA and one in Australia. Outcomes of interest included breastfeeding, operative deliveries, gestational complications, depression, stress, experiences, bonding and sterilisation. Conclusion The research on maternal health outcomes pertaining to incarcerated women is limited. There is a need for in‐depth examination of breastfeeding with this population. Researchers need to examine the prevalence and impact of carceral force, such as shackling, solitary confinement, strip‐searching and restraints in pregnancy. There is a need for research that asks what health outcomes matter to the women themselves. Relevance to clinical practice Providers must be conscious of intersecting layers of discrimination and trauma incarcerated women experience and its impact on maternal health in the perinatal period and advocate for women.

Suggested Citation

  • Martha Jane Paynter & Emily K. Drake & Christine Cassidy & Erna Snelgrove‐Clarke, 2019. "Maternal health outcomes for incarcerated women: A scoping review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2046-2060, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2046-2060
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14837
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2046-2060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.