IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i1-2p310-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usability of a wearable fall detection prototype from the perspective of older people–A real field testing approach

Author

Listed:
  • Friederike J. S. Thilo
  • Sabine Hahn
  • Ruud J. G. Halfens
  • Jos M. G. A. Schols

Abstract

Aims and objectives Community‐dwelling older people were involved in the testing of a fall detection device to improve its utilisation and acceptance in everyday life. Background The usability of alerting devices remains unsatisfactory, as they are scarcely utilised by older people, despite wide recognition of the importance of rapid assistance after a fall. Moreover, the time a person remains on the floor negatively impacts the severity of fall consequences. However, it is unclear how to increase alerting device utilisation in everyday life. Therefore, older people were involved in this research to consider their perspective during prototype development. Design A qualitative focus group study was conducted, following a real field testing approach, underpinned by the theoretical framework “Medical Device Technology Development Process.” Methods Fifteen community‐dwelling older people tested the prototype in daily living over a period of nine days. Different means of involvement were exploited such as “user seminars” or “discussion with users.” On day 9, data were collected using focus groups and analysed with qualitative content analysis. Results The participants’ perspectives yielded positive aspects of the prototype along with aspects requiring improvement. They indicated that technical requirements are essential. They also revealed that a minimal change in daily routines, support for physical activity and independent living and the inclusion of trusted contact persons could lead to wider use of the alerting device. Conclusions Involving users is crucial in gaining a deeper understanding of aspects influencing utilisation of an alerting device. The study revealed that usability is influenced both by technical requirements as well as habits and personal preferences. This finding is vital, as habits and personal preferences can only be identified through the involvement of target users. Relevance to clinical practice The study provides key insights for health practitioners interested in promoting the use of an alerting device in community‐dwelling older people.

Suggested Citation

  • Friederike J. S. Thilo & Sabine Hahn & Ruud J. G. Halfens & Jos M. G. A. Schols, 2019. "Usability of a wearable fall detection prototype from the perspective of older people–A real field testing approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 310-320, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:310-320
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14599
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeronimo Luengo-Polo & David Conde-Caballero & Borja Rivero-Jiménez & Inmaculada Ballesteros-Yáñez & Carlos A. Castillo-Sarmiento & Lorenzo Mariano-Juárez, 2021. "Rationale and Methods of Evaluation for ACHO, A New Virtual Assistant to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Rural Elderly Populations: A User-Driven Living Lab," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:310-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.