IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1651-e1659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What are they talking about? Content of the communication exchanges between nurses, patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study

Author

Listed:
  • Anette Johnsson
  • Petra Wagman
  • Åse Boman
  • Sandra Pennbrant

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore and describe the content of the communication exchanges between nurses, patients and their relatives in a department of medicine for older people in western Sweden. Background Information, messages and knowledge are constantly being communicated between nurses, older patients and relatives in the healthcare sector. The quality of communication between them has a major influence on patient outcomes. A prerequisite for good care to be given and received is that there is mutual understanding between the parties involved. Design An ethnographic study was informed by a sociocultural perspective. Method Data were collected through 40 participatory observations of meetings between nurses and older patients and/or relatives which covered 135 hr of nurse‐patient‐relative interaction, field notes, 40 field conversations with 24 nurses and 40 field conversations with patients (n = 40) and relatives (n = 26). Five semi‐structured interviews were conducted with nurses. An ethnographic analysis was performed. Results The analysis identified three categories of content of the communication exchanges: medical content focusing on the patient's medical condition, personal content focusing on the patient's life story and explanatory content focusing on the patient's health and nursing needs. The content is influenced by the situation and context. Conclusions Nurses would benefit from more awareness and understanding of the importance of the communication content and of the value of asking the didactic questions (how, when, what and why) to improve the patients’ and relatives’ understanding of the information exchanges and to increase patient safety. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses can use the communication content to create conditions enabling them to obtain a holistic view of the patient's life history and to develop an appropriate person‐centred care plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Anette Johnsson & Petra Wagman & Åse Boman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "What are they talking about? Content of the communication exchanges between nurses, patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1651-1659, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1651-e1659
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14315
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Nygren Zotterman & Lisa Skär & Malin Olsson & Siv Söderberg, 2016. "Being in togetherness: meanings of encounters within primary healtcare setting for patients living with long‐term illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2854-2862, October.
    2. Rose M Olsen & Bjørg H Østnor & Ingela Enmarker & Ove Hellzén, 2013. "Barriers to information exchange during older patients' transfer: nurses' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2964-2973, October.
    3. Annette Nygårdh & Dan Malm & Kerstin Wikby & Gerd Ahlström, 2012. "The experience of empowerment in the patient–staff encounter: the patient's perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 897-904, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgia Tobiano & Christine Ting & Christine Ryan & Kim Jenkinson & Lucie Scott & Andrea P. Marshall, 2020. "Front‐line nurses' perceptions of intra‐hospital handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2231-2238, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liselott Årestedt & Carina Persson & Margareta Rämgård & Eva Benzein, 2018. "Experiences of encounters with healthcare professionals through the lenses of families living with chronic illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 836-847, February.
    2. Anette Johnsson & Åse Boman & Petra Wagman & Sandra Pennbrant, 2018. "Voices used by nurses when communicating with patients and relatives in a department of medicine for older people—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1640-1650, April.
    3. Helena Lööf & Unn‐Britt Johansson, 2019. "“A body in transformation”—An empirical phenomenological study about fear‐avoidance beliefs towards physical activity among persons experiencing moderate‐to‐severe rheumatic pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 321-329, January.
    4. Faramarz Pourasghar & Nesa Kavakebi & Jafar Tabrizi & Ahad Mohammadi, 2016. "Barriers to Communication and Information Exchange in Patient Transfer and Its Consequences," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(12), pages 178-178, December.
    5. Elias David Lundereng & Alfhild Dihle & Simen A. Steindal, 2020. "Nurses’ experiences and perspectives on collaborative discharge planning when patients receiving palliative care for cancer are discharged home from hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3382-3391, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1651-e1659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.