IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6pe940-e950.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors that influence care priority for chest pain patients using the manchester triage system

Author

Listed:
  • Carine Lais Nonnenmacher
  • Ananda Ughini Bertoldo Pires
  • Vítor Monteiro Moraes
  • Amália de Fátima Lucena

Abstract

Aims and objectives To analyse crucial factors for determining care priority for patients with acute myocardial infarction based on the Manchester Triage System. Background Triage is the first potentially critical step in the care of myocardial infarction patients. However, there are still very few studies on the factors interfering in the lack of care priority for these patients, impacting their treatment and prognosis. Design Retrospective cohort study with 217 patients in the emergency department of a Brazilian hospital. Methods Data were collected from patients' records with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction, from March 2014–February 2015. Patients were divided into two groups for statistical analysis: high priority (immediate and very urgent) and low priority (urgent, standard and nonurgent). Results Most of the patients were male, with a mean age of 62.1 years, with a prevalence of high blood pressure and smoking as risk factors. Lower care priority level was assigned to 116 (53.4%) patients. Sixty‐four (29.5%) patients had ST‐segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, and 29 (45.3%) of these patients were assigned lower care priority level. Coughing, abdominal pain, onset of symptoms over 24 hr ago and pain of mild to moderate intensity were clinical predictors associated with lower care priority level. Sweating and high blood pressure were associated with high care priority level. Lower care priority level was associated with increased door‐to‐electrocardiogram and door‐to‐troponin times. There was no significant difference between the two groups for door‐to‐needle and door‐to‐balloon times. Conclusions Most of the patients with myocardial infarction were classified as low care priority, showing triage failure either due to symptom variability or need for professional qualification in clinical data collection and interpretation. Relevance to clinical practice The results may support clinical evaluation, bringing chest pain assessment into focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Carine Lais Nonnenmacher & Ananda Ughini Bertoldo Pires & Vítor Monteiro Moraes & Amália de Fátima Lucena, 2018. "Factors that influence care priority for chest pain patients using the manchester triage system," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 940-950, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e940-e950
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e940-e950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.