IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6p1081-1093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived language proficiency and pain assessment by registered and student nurses in native English‐speaking and EAL children aged 4–7 years

Author

Listed:
  • Pary M Azize
  • Allegra Cattani
  • Ruth Endacott

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify the factors that influence decisions made by health professionals when assessing the pain of native English speaking and children whose English is an additional language. Background Pain assessment in children is often poorly executed following acute injury. Whilst a range of pain assessment tools have been developed, little guidance is provided for assessing pain in children with English as an additional language. Design Factorial survey design. Methods Twenty minor injuries unit nurses and 20 children's nursing students participated in an electronic survey to make judgements on 12 scenarios describing a child attending a minor injuries unit following an incident, accompanied by a parent. Respondents had to decide the most important form of pain assessment, and whether they would ask a parent or an interpreter to assess the pain of the child. An open‐ended question asked about the difficulties found in making a judgement. Results Observation of the child's behaviour was the most common pain assessment reported. The visual analogue scale was significantly associated with children with proficient English. Respondents were significantly more likely to involve parents in the assessment if they could speak English well compared to parents with poor English skills. Moreover, nursing students were significantly more likely than registered nurses to call for support from an interpreter. Thematic analysis identified three themes related to difficulties with pain assessment: contrasting approaches, differing perceptions of pain and overcoming challenges. Conclusions The reduced ability to communicate between child, parent and healthcare professional highlights the need to identify forms of assessment based on individual cases. Relevance to clinical practice The number of children with English as an additional language has seen a marked rise over the last decade. In situations where communication ability is reduced, assessment of pain should be tailored to meet the needs of the child. This may require timely access to interpreter services.

Suggested Citation

  • Pary M Azize & Allegra Cattani & Ruth Endacott, 2018. "Perceived language proficiency and pain assessment by registered and student nurses in native English‐speaking and EAL children aged 4–7 years," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1081-1093, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1081-1093
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14134
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janice E Rattray & William Lauder & Ruth Ludwick & Carolyn Johnstone & Richard Zeller & Janice Winchell & Elizabeth Myers & Anne Smith, 2011. "Indicators of acute deterioration in adult patients nursed in acute wards: a factorial survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 723-732, March.
    2. Pary M. Azize & Ruth Endacott & Allegra Cattani & Ann Humphreys, 2014. "Cultural responses to pain in UK children of primary school age: A mixed‐methods study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 186-192, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jørghild Karlotte Jensen & Randi Skår & Bodil Tveit, 2018. "The impact of Early Warning Score and Rapid Response Systems on nurses’ competence: An integrative literature review and synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1256-1274, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1081-1093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.