IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4pe503-e513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Menstruation, objectification and health‐related quality of life: A questionnaire study

Author

Listed:
  • Herdís Sveinsdóttir

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore young women's health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) and investigate whether menstrual and menarche experiences and objectification predict mental and physical health components of HRQOL. Background Menstruation plays a fundamental role in female biology, in women's relationship to their bodies and consequently in women's health and their HRQOL. Design Cross‐sectional explorative survey design. Method A questionnaire that included the SF‐36v2, the Self‐objectification Questionnaire (SOQ), the Body Surveillance and Body Shame subscales of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale, the Belief and Attitudes Towards Menstruation Questionnaire (four subscales), and questions on menarche and menstruation was administered at the end of 2013 to 319 Icelandic women who represented the population by age. The SF‐36v2 includes eight dimensions addressing the mental and physical components of HRQOL. Scores are presented as raw data scores and scores based on standardised score of American women and range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better HRQL. A hierarchical multiple linear regression model was employed to calculate significant predictors of mental and physical health components of HRQOL. Results Mean raw data scores on SF36‐v2 dimensions ranged from 54.7 to 91.5. The participants scored below the standardised, mean norm‐based score for all dimensions. Secrecy of menstruation, experience of body shame and pain during menstruation predicted worse mental HRQOL. To believe in the proscriptive role and the unpleasantness of menstruation, experience of body shame, medication for menstrual pain and not holding a university education predicted worse physical HRQOL. These two models explained 30% and 22% of the variance of the mental and physical components of SF36‐v2, respectively. Conclusion Young women's mental and physical HRQOL is influenced by the specific context of their lives. Relevance to clinical practice Women's health education should take into account the various relationships women may have with their bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Herdís Sveinsdóttir, 2018. "Menstruation, objectification and health‐related quality of life: A questionnaire study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 503-513, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e503-e513
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wing Chi Wong & Mei Kuen Li & Wai Ying Veronica Chan & Yuen Yu Choi & Chi Hung Sandra Fong & Ka Wah Kara Lam & Wun Chi Sham & Ping Ping So & Kit Wong & Kuen Ha Yeung & Tsz Yan Yeung, 2013. "A cross‐sectional study of the beliefs and attitudes towards menstruation of Chinese undergraduate males and females in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3320-3327, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Jing Su & Deborah Lindell, 2016. "Promoting the menstrual health of adolescent girls in China," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 481-487, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e503-e513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.