IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4p784-794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and initial validation of a clinical measure to assess early symptoms of post‐stroke depression in the acute stroke patient

Author

Listed:
  • Jufang Li
  • Linda Denise Oakley
  • Yun Li
  • Yong Luo

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate a measure specifically developed to clinically assess early symptoms of poststroke depression (PSD) in acute stroke patients. Background Poststroke depression is associated with elevated rates of morbidity and mortality following a mild‐to‐moderate stroke. Measures currently used to assess depression in acute poststroke patients can lack the clinical specificity necessary to detect symptoms within 30 days poststroke. Design A two‐round Delphi design was used to estimate symptom consensus. Methods Three panels, healthcare professionals (N = 74), experts (N = 16) and acute poststroke patients (N = 40), evaluated an initial set of symptom‐items systematically developed by the research team. Results Our study yielded consensus for 29 symptom‐items. Additional symptoms recommended by acute poststroke patients increased the final number of symptoms to 35. Conclusions We developed a specific measure of early symptoms of PSD in acute stroke patients with good content validity. Relevance to clinical practice The specific clinical relevance of our findings lies in the consensus of health professionals, the Delphi panel and patients regarding core areas of clinical assessment during the acute poststroke phase. And our findings may draw attention to the need to assess and treat acute stroke patients with early symptoms of PSD.

Suggested Citation

  • Jufang Li & Linda Denise Oakley & Yun Li & Yong Luo, 2018. "Development and initial validation of a clinical measure to assess early symptoms of post‐stroke depression in the acute stroke patient," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 784-794, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:784-794
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ping‐ping He & Qian‐qian Shen & Ye‐shi Chen & Juping Yu & Zhao‐xia Li & Xin‐ping Ouyang, 2020. "Development and validation of a Chinese‐language instrument measuring empowerment needs of patients after a percutaneous coronary intervention," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 364-373, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:784-794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.