IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i19-20p3482-3489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Encouraging interprofessional collaboration: The effects of clinical protocols

Author

Listed:
  • Mark J Barrow
  • Susan E Gasquoine

Abstract

Aims and objectives To consider the characteristics of protocol documents themselves as a factor influencing the nature of care delivery and their potential to facilitate greater interprofessional collaboration. Background Healthcare guidelines and clinical protocols provide important guidance and direction to health professionals in their delivery of care. By detailing requirements and actions to be taken in specified circumstances or contexts, these documents may facilitate a broadening of the pool of people able to deliver care. Design Critical reading of four clinical protocols representing the range of protocol types in use was carried out to consider the extent to which the documentation of guidelines and protocols and the documents themselves might be considered as vehicles for increased collaboration in health care. Methods A “close reading” rubric was developed directing the researcher to look for evidence in each protocol of the following: authorship, person or group responsible for the protocol's development; stated document purpose; target readers, either stated or implied; the particular subjects, the document names and the objects created by them such as care pathways; the use of specific terminology and imagery, the documents’ form and structure; and evidence of intertextuality referring to other documents, for example legislation or policy statements. Tabulation of the coding analysis is presented. Results Nurses were the only professional group named in the documents as assignees or subjects. “Patients” and “care” are the objects created, and the scientific–biomedical discourse with its associated procedural language was dominant. Conclusions Many protocols have been developed to standardise practice and increase the effectiveness of teamwork. They may, however, constrain collaboration in healthcare settings because they diminish a nursing “voice” and create the expectation that nurses alone work across the spectrum of protocols. Relevance to clinical practice An unintended consequence of the global use of clinical protocols and guidelines to support safe and efficient healthcare delivery may be to reduce interprofessional collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark J Barrow & Susan E Gasquoine, 2018. "Encouraging interprofessional collaboration: The effects of clinical protocols," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3482-3489, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3482-3489
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin S McNamara & Gerard M Fealy & Mary Casey & Ruth Geraghty & Maree Johnson & Phil Halligan & Pearl Treacy & Michelle Butler, 2011. "Boundary matters: clinical leadership and the distinctive disciplinary contribution of nursing to multidisciplinary care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3502-3512, December.
    2. Martin S McNamara & Gerard M Fealy, 2010. "Guest editorial: Lead us not again: clinical leadership and the disciplinary contribution," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3257-3259, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Stanley & Karen Stanley, 2018. "Clinical leadership and nursing explored: A literature search," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1730-1743, May.
    2. Judy Mannix & Lesley Wilkes & John Daly, 2015. "‘Good ethics and moral standing’: a qualitative study of aesthetic leadership in clinical nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1603-1610, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3482-3489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.