IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2pe320-e334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study of factors in nurses' and physicians' decision‐making related to family presence during resuscitation

Author

Listed:
  • Renee Twibell
  • Debra Siela
  • Cheryl Riwitis
  • Alexis Neal
  • Nicole Waters

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the similarities and differences in factors that influence nurses' and physicians' decision‐making related to family presence during resuscitation. Background Despite the growing acceptance of family presence during resuscitation worldwide, healthcare professionals continue to debate the risks and benefits of family presence. As many hospitals lack a policy to guide family presence during resuscitation, decisions are negotiated by resuscitation teams, families and patients in crisis situations. Research has not clarified the factors that influence the decision‐making processes of nurses and physicians related to inviting family presence. This is the first study to elicit written data from healthcare professionals to explicate factors in decision‐making about family presence. Design Qualitative exploratory‐descriptive. Methods Convenience samples of registered nurses (n = 325) and acute care physicians (n = 193) from a Midwestern hospital in the United States of America handwrote responses to open‐ended questions about family presence. Through thematic analysis, decision‐making factors for physicians and nurses were identified and compared. Results Physicians and nurses evaluated three similar factors and four differing factors when deciding to invite family presence during resuscitation. Furthermore, nurses and physicians weighted the factors differently. Physicians weighted most heavily the family's potential to disrupt life‐saving efforts and compromise patient care and then the family's knowledge about resuscitations. Nurses heavily weighted the potential for the family to be traumatised, the potential for the family to disrupt the resuscitation, and possible family benefit. Conclusions Nurses and physicians considered both similar and different factors when deciding to invite family presence. Physicians focused on the patient primarily, while nurses focused on the patient, family and resuscitation team. Relevance to clinical practice Knowledge of factors that influence the decision‐making of interprofessional colleagues can improve collaboration and communication in crisis events of family presence during resuscitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Renee Twibell & Debra Siela & Cheryl Riwitis & Alexis Neal & Nicole Waters, 2018. "A qualitative study of factors in nurses' and physicians' decision‐making related to family presence during resuscitation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 320-334, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e320-e334
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13948
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. France Légaré & Stéphane Turcotte & Dawn Stacey & Stéphane Ratté & Jennifer Kryworuchko & Ian Graham, 2012. "Patients’ Perceptions of Sharing in Decisions," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Nga Yee Leung & Susan KY Chow, 2012. "Attitudes of healthcare staff and patients’ family members towards family presence during resuscitation in adult critical care units," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 2083-2093, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josefin Rahmqvist Linnarsson & Eva Benzein & Kristofer Årestedt, 2015. "Nurses' views of forensic care in emergency departments and their attitudes, and involvement of family members," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 266-274, January.
    2. Abbas Al Mutair & Virginia Plummer & Anthony Paul O'Brien & Rosemary Clerehan, 2014. "Attitudes of healthcare providers towards family involvement and presence in adult critical care units in Saudi Arabia: a quantitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 744-755, March.
    3. Coleen E. Toronto & Susan A. LaRocco, 2019. "Family perception of and experience with family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 32-46, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e320-e334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.