IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i9-10p1281-1290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergency nurses' evaluation of observational pain assessment tools for older people with cognitive impairment

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Fry
  • Glenn Arendts
  • Lynn Chenoweth

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore emergency nurses’ perceptions of the feasibility and utility of Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia tool in people over 65 with cognitive impairment. The Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia tool was then compared with The Abbey Pain Scale, Doloplus‐2 and PACSLAC. The objective was to determine which observational pain assessment tool was the most appropriate for the emergency department context and the cognitively impaired older person. Background The number of older people with cognitive impairment conditions, such as dementia, presenting to the emergency department is increasing. Approximately 28% of people over 65 years who present will have cognitive impairment. Older people with cognitive impairment often receive suboptimal pain management in the ED. There is limited evidence of the use and/or appropriateness of dementia‐specific pain observation assessment tools in the ED. Design This was a multicentre exploratory qualitative study, which was conducted within a constructivist paradigm. Methods Focus group interviews were conducted with nurses across three hospital emergency departments. Data were subject to thematic analysis. Results Six focus groups were conducted with 36 nurses over a 12‐week period. Four themes emerged from the analysis: 1) cognitive impairment is a barrier to pain management; 2) PAINAD gives structure to pain assessment; 3) PAINAD assists to convey pain intensity; and 4) selection of an appropriate observational pain assessment tool. Conclusions This study identified that emergency nurses find it challenging to detect, assess and manage pain in cognitively impaired people. While the use of the PAINAD helped to address these challenges compared to other tools, nurses also identified the important role that family and carers can play in pain assessment and management for older people with cognitive impairment. Relevance to clinical practice This study has generated new knowledge that has broad application across clinical settings, which can assist to transform pain management practice and reduce human suffering. The use of an observational pain assessment tool can provide for greater practice consistency for patients with communication difficulties. Pain management for older people with cognitive impairment is best achieved by the use an appropriate observational pain assessment tool and with a multidisciplinary approach that includes the person and their family/carer.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Fry & Glenn Arendts & Lynn Chenoweth, 2017. "Emergency nurses' evaluation of observational pain assessment tools for older people with cognitive impairment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1281-1290, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:9-10:p:1281-1290
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robyn Gallagher & Margaret Fry & Lynne Chenoweth & Patrick Gallagher & Jane Stein‐Parbury, 2014. "Emergency department nurses’ perceptions and experiences of providing care for older people," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 449-453, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Morphet & Kelly Decker & Kimberley Crawford & Kelli Innes & Allison Fiona Williams & Debra Griffiths, 2015. "Aged care residents in the emergency department: the experiences of relatives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3647-3653, December.
    2. Julia Eriksson & Linda Gellerstedt & Pernilla Hillerås & Åsa G Craftman, 2018. "Registered nurses’ perceptions of safe care in overcrowded emergency departments," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1061-1067, March.
    3. Jane Stein‐Parbury & Robyn Gallagher & Margaret Fry & Lynn Chenoweth & Patrick Gallagher, 2015. "Expectations and experiences of older people and their carers in relation to emergency department arrival and care: A qualitative study in Australia," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 476-482, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:9-10:p:1281-1290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.