IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i17-18p2545-2557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symptom clusters in patients receiving haemodialysis: a systematic review of observational studies

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyi Cao
  • Lang Tian
  • Chen Lin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To systematically review the common composition and the analytical methods performed to derive symptom clusters in patients receiving haemodialysis, and to examine their common predictive and outcome variables. Background Patients receiving haemodialysis may suffer from multiple and interactive symptoms simultaneously, which may impact their mortality, morbidity and quality of life. The composition of these symptom clusters varies depending on the different assessment tools, the variant evaluation timing points and the various statistical methodologies. A detailed review of existing studies is needed. Design A systematic review of observational studies. Methods Medline from 1950, CINAHL from 1960, Embase from 1980 and PsycINFO from 1967 as well as additional sources were searched. Content analysis was conducted to identify articles assessing the interrelationships of multiple symptoms. Results Five studies were identified. Several symptom clusters were identified with five common groupings being uraemic cluster, neuromuscular cluster, skin cluster, gastrointestinal cluster and energy/fatigue cluster. Four studies performed the principal component analysis with varimax rotation to extract symptom clusters and one study used correlation analysis. Different symptom assessment tools were used and each involving different array of symptoms. The predictive and outcome variables of symptom clusters also varied considerably. No studies have examined the longitudinal course and patients’ subjective experiences of symptom clusters. Conclusions Inconsistencies in the composition of symptom clusters across studies were identified due to inconsistencies in symptom assessment tools and statistical methodologies. Future studies should focus on an agreement about a robust and clinically relevant definition on symptom clusters; a multidimensional, valid and reliable symptom assessment tool; and an optimal analytical method in patients receiving haemodialysis. Relevance to clinical practice Knowledge of symptom clusters may contribute to understanding the aetiology and pathophysiology of multiple concurrent and interactive symptoms in patients receiving haemodialysis and exploring the effects of these symptoms on clinical outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyi Cao & Lang Tian & Chen Lin, 2017. "Symptom clusters in patients receiving haemodialysis: a systematic review of observational studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2545-2557, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2545-2557
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13644
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marques Shek Nam Ng & Cho Lee Wong & Eva Hau Sim Ho & Yun Ho Hui & Christine Miaskowski & Winnie Kwok Wei So, 2020. "Burden of living with multiple concurrent symptoms in patients with end‐stage renal disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2589-2601, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2545-2557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.