IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i13-14p1939-1948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition from an open‐plan to a two‐cot neonatal intensive care unit: a participatory action research approach

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret Broom
  • Anne Gardner
  • Zsuzsoka Kecskes
  • Sue Kildea

Abstract

Aims and objectives To facilitate staff transition from an open‐plan to a two‐cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Background In 2012, an Australian regional neonatal intensive care unit transitioned from an open‐plan to a two‐cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Research has reported single‐ and small‐room neonatal intensive care unit design may negatively impact on the distances nurses walk, reducing the time they spend providing direct neonatal care. Studies have also reported nurses feel isolated and need additional support and education in such neonatal intensive care units. Staff highlighted their concerns regarding the impact of the new design on workflow and clinical practice. Design A participatory action research approach. Methods A participatory action group titled the Change and Networking Group collaborated with staff over a four‐year period (2009–2013) to facilitate the transition. The Change and Networking Group used a collaborative, cyclical process of planning, gathering data, taking action and reviewing the results to plan the next action. Data sources included meeting and workshop minutes, newsletters, feedback boards, subgroup reports and a staff satisfaction survey. Results The study findings include a description of (1) how the participatory action research cycles were used by the Change and Networking Group: providing examples of projects and strategies undertaken; and (2) evaluations of participatory action research methodology and Group by neonatal intensive care unit staff and Change and Networking members. Conclusion This study has described the benefits of using participatory action research to facilitate staff transition from an open‐plan to a two‐cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Participatory action research methodology enabled the inclusion of staff to find solutions to design and clinical practice questions. Future research is required to assess the long‐term effect of neonatal intensive care unit design on staff workload, maintaining and supporting a skilled workforce as well as the impact of a new neonatal intensive care unit design on the neonatal intensive care unit culture. Relevance to clinical practice A supportive work environment for staff is critical in providing high‐quality health care.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret Broom & Anne Gardner & Zsuzsoka Kecskes & Sue Kildea, 2017. "Transition from an open‐plan to a two‐cot neonatal intensive care unit: a participatory action research approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1939-1948, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1939-1948
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13509
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1939-1948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.