IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i1-2p61-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can follow‐up phone calls improve patients self‐monitoring of blood glucose?

Author

Listed:
  • Cheryl Brown‐Deacon
  • Terri Brown
  • Constance Creech
  • Marilyn McFarland
  • Anupama Nair
  • Kevin Whitlow

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of follow‐up phone calls in improving frequency of glucose monitoring over a three month period in two groups of patients with type 2 diabetes with the goal to lower haemoglobin A1C. Background Telephone intervention has been successfully used in improving adherence to diabetes self‐management and other chronic disease conditions. Design A quality improvement study. Methods Forty one Type 2 diabetic patients with HA1C ≥7·5% were included in the study. The patients were assigned to two groups. The first group of patients received standard diabetic care (Group 1) and the second group of patients (Group 2) received standard diabetic care plus follow‐up phone calls within two weeks after a monthly clinic visit over a three month period. A haemoglobin A1C if indicated was done at the initial study visit. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline haemoglobin A1C between the two groups or the three month haemoglobin A1C of the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in mean haemoglobin A1C change between Group 1 and Group 2. The analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between groups in the number of patients who kept logs of their blood glucose readings throughout the study. Conclusion The intervention using telephone follow‐up calls did not show a statistically significant improvement in overall HA1C, but there was a clinically significant change in HA1C in the group of patients that received follow‐up phone calls. Relevance to clinical practice The clinical significance of the change in A1C in the follow‐up phone call group (Group 2) supports that frequent contact by telephone may likely improve adherence to diabetes self‐management.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheryl Brown‐Deacon & Terri Brown & Constance Creech & Marilyn McFarland & Anupama Nair & Kevin Whitlow, 2017. "Can follow‐up phone calls improve patients self‐monitoring of blood glucose?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 61-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:61-67
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitra Zolfaghari & Seyedeh A Mousavifar & Shadan Pedram & Hamid Haghani, 2012. "Retracted: The impact of nurse short message services and telephone follow‐ups on diabetic adherence: which one is more effective?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 1922-1931, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selda Celik & Gulhan Cosansu & Semra Erdogan & Alev Kahraman & Sengul Isik & Gulay Bayrak & Belgin Bektas & Nermin Olgun, 2015. "Using mobile phone text messages to improve insulin injection technique and glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus: a multi‐centre study in Turkey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1525-1533, June.
    2. Tracy DeKoekkoek & Barbara Given & Charles W Given & Kimberly Ridenour & Monica Schueller & Sandra L Spoelstra, 2015. "mHealth SMS text messaging interventions and to promote medication adherence: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2722-2735, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:61-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.