IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i21-22p3326-3332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of nonswallow nasogastric tube intubation: a randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Luo Fan
  • Qin Liu
  • Li Gui

Abstract

Aims and objectives To prospectively identify the effect of the nonswallow procedure of nasogastric tube insertion. Background Nasogastric intubation is one of the most important and basic skills in treatment and nursing. Patients generally experience discomfort and encounter complications during this procedure. Thus, practitioners need a more convenient, effective, quicker and safer method to improve the performance of this procedure. Design This prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted from March to May 2014 in the four units of Gansun Province Hospital in Lanzhou, China. Method A total of 80 participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 40) and a control group (n = 40). Participants in the experimental group underwent a nonswallow procedure for nasogastric tube insertion. Results There were statistically significant differences in nasogastric tube insertion between the study groups. A marked increase in the success rate at first intubation as well as a markedly reduced occurrence of nausea, tearing, mucosal injury and changes in vital signs (i.e. heart rate, breath, systolic pressure) were observed compared with the control group. No differences in the success rates at second and third intubation were observed between the groups. Conclusions The nonswallow procedure of nasogastric tube intubation relieves discomfort and ensures the safety of patients. Relevance to clinical practice Patients subjected to nasogastric intubation are more likely to benefit from the nonswallow procedure when nasogastric tube insertion is performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo Fan & Qin Liu & Li Gui, 2016. "Efficacy of nonswallow nasogastric tube intubation: a randomised controlled trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3326-3332, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3326-3332
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13398
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3326-3332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.