IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p2958-2966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender differences in feelings and knowledge about stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Itzhaki
  • Semyon Melnikov
  • Silvia Koton

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine gender differences in knowledge and feelings about stroke among ≥40 years old population. Background Knowledge of stroke is consistently found to be poor among both genders in general populations, however, it has been reported to be better among women than men. Gender differences in feelings about stroke in the general population have not been examined. Design and methods Data were collected from a convenience sample using semi‐structured personal interviews. Participants were representative of Israeli sub‐populations aged ≥40 with no history of stroke. Knowledge of stroke was studied with quantitative methods while constant comparative analysis was used for the qualitative data analysis of feelings evoked by stroke. Results One hundred and seventy‐seven participants were interviewed, 79/177 (44·6%) men and 98/177 (55·4%) women. Rates of self‐reported hypertension [33/79 (41·8%) men, 25/98 (25·5%) women] and current smoking [29/79 (36·7%) men, 18/98 (18·4%) women] were significantly higher in men than women. Over 50% men and women mentioned one‐side sudden weakness or paralysis as a stroke symptom, however, other stroke symptoms were not recognised by most participants. Education was associated with the number of identified stroke signs. Knowledge of stroke‐warning signs was better in women. The main feelings expressed by both genders were fear of dying and disability, self‐concern about survival, blaming fate and self‐accusation. Conclusion Stroke knowledge is poor among men and women. Higher level of education is a predictor of stroke knowledge among both genders. Gender‐specific differences in stroke risk factors and feelings about stroke in different sub‐populations should be taken into account to improve prevention of stroke through education programmes. Relevance to clinical practice Health education on stroke prevention should be tailored to population groups differing in level of education. Health promotion recommendations should be provided by nurses with regard to beliefs of both men and women regarding prevention of stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Itzhaki & Semyon Melnikov & Silvia Koton, 2016. "Gender differences in feelings and knowledge about stroke," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2958-2966, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2958-2966
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13366
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Zeng & Guo‐Ping He & Guang‐Hui Yi & Yan‐Jin Huang & Qing‐Hai Zhang & Ling‐Ling He, 2012. "Knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors among patients with previous stroke or TIA in China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2886-2895, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Napolitano & Francesco Bencivenga & Erika Pompili & Italo Francesco Angelillo, 2019. "Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors toward Eating Disorders among Adolescents in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monique F Kilkenny & Libby Dunstan & Doreen Busingye & Tara Purvis & Megan Reyneke & Mary Orgill & Dominique A Cadilhac, 2017. "Knowledge of risk factors for diabetes or cardiovascular disease (CVD) is poor among individuals with risk factors for CVD," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Linchong Pothiban & Chomphoonut Srirat, 2019. "Association between stroke knowledge, stroke awareness, and preventive behaviors among older people: A cross‐sectional study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 399-405, September.
    3. Juanjuan Liu & Qi Liu & Yanjin Huang & Wen Wang & Guoping He & Ying Zeng, 2020. "Effects of personal characteristics, disease uncertainty and knowledge on family caregivers' preparedness of stroke survivors: a cross‐sectional study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 892-902, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2958-2966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.