IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i15-16p2126-2133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognising and responding to ‘cutting corners’ when providing nursing care: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Jones
  • Megan‐Jane Johnstone
  • Maxine Duke

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study is to report on a key finding of a larger study investigating the ‘gaps’ in patient care that registered nurses encounter during the course of their practice. A key finding of this larger study was that ‘cutting corners’ was a gap discerned by nurses. Background ‘Cutting corners’ has been characterised as a ‘violation’ and threat to patient safety, although there is a paucity of research on this issue. Design Naturalistic inquiry using a qualitative exploratory descriptive approach. Methods Data were collected from a purposeful sample of 71 registered nurses from emergency department, critical care, perioperative, rehabilitation and transitional care and neurosciences settings in Australia and analysed using content and thematic analysis strategies. Results Cutting corners was a common practice that encompassed (1) the partial or complete omission of patient care, (2) delays in providing care and (3) the failure to do things correctly. Corners were cut in patient assessment, essential nursing care, the care of central venous catheters and medication administration. The practice of cutting corners was perceived as contributing to preventable adverse events. Conclusions The study found that cutting corners created gaps that contributed to unfinished nursing care and preventable adverse events. The findings of the study raise the possibility that cutting corners is a salient but underinvestigated characteristic of nursing practice. Further research and inquiry are needed to deepen understanding of cutting corners and its impact on patient safety. Relevance to clinical practice Identifying the nature and implications of cutting corners when providing nursing care is an important contributing factor to improving patient safety and quality care.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Jones & Megan‐Jane Johnstone & Maxine Duke, 2016. "Recognising and responding to ‘cutting corners’ when providing nursing care: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2126-2133, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2126-2133
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banja, John, 2010. "The normalization of deviance in healthcare delivery," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 139-148, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huakang Liang & Ken-Yu Lin & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su, 2018. "The Impact of Coworkers’ Safety Violations on an Individual Worker: A Social Contagion Effect within the Construction Crew," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David L B Schwappach & Katrin Gehring, 2014. "Silence That Can Be Dangerous: A Vignette Study to Assess Healthcare Professionals’ Likelihood of Speaking up about Safety Concerns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Dahlin, Kristina & Chuang, You-Ta & Roulet, Thomas J, 2018. "Opportunity, Motivation, and Ability to Learn from Failures and Errors: Review, Synthesis, and Ways to Move Forward," SocArXiv 4qwzh, Center for Open Science.
    3. Birgitte Lerbæk & Rikke Jørgensen & Andrea McCloughen, 2023. "“It’s Not Important”—The Social Constructing of Poor Physical Health as ‘Normal’ among People with Schizophrenia: Integrated Findings from an Ethnographic Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Kristian Ringsby Odberg & Britt Sætre Hansen & Karina Aase & Sigrid Wangensteen, 2018. "Medication administration and interruptions in nursing homes: A qualitative observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1113-1124, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2126-2133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.