IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i13-14p1901-1911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Sticking to carpets’ – assessment and judgement in health visiting practice in an era of risk: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline King

Abstract

Aim and objective This paper aims to explore health visitors’ accounts of assessment and judgement in health visiting in the context of policy change and an increased focus on risk, which is reshaping practice. Background Assessment and judgement underpin the targeting of support in health visiting practice. Existing literature suggests that needs assessment in health visiting is a complex process which draws on different types of knowledge. Methods The study, upon which this paper draws, was a qualitative exploration which aimed to explore the impact of policy change on health visiting practice and on families. The accounts of sixteen health visitors, who took part in semi‐structured interviews, are reported. The interview data were analysed using thematic and narrative techniques. Results Health visitors’ accounts of their observations of families’ homes, relationships and practices, such as their references to ‘dirt’, harmful practices and appropriateness, illustrate ways in which assessment and judgement in health visiting practice are shaped by a discourse of risk and notions of ideal parenting. Health visitors problematise this discourse in relation to the potential stigmatising impacts for families. Although health visitors indicate ambivalence towards the use of assessment tools, the findings indicate that they feel the tools provide them with a safety‐net at a time when their practice is being reshaped by a discourse of risk. Conclusion This paper identifies that assessment and judgement in contemporary health visiting are shaped by a discourse of risk. A discussion of the role of ‘emotion in use’ and collective emotions provides an appropriate theoretical lens to consider the impact that risk discourse has on health visiting practice and on families. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights the need for assessment and judgement in health visiting practice to be highly reflexive, to support families in an era of risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline King, 2016. "‘Sticking to carpets’ – assessment and judgement in health visiting practice in an era of risk: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 1901-1911, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:13-14:p:1901-1911
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:13-14:p:1901-1911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.