IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i7-8p1132-1143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu‐Fei Chen
  • Kuei‐Ru Chou
  • Yuan‐Mei Liao
  • Cheng‐Hsun Ho
  • Min‐Huey Chung

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop a Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool and validate its psychometric properties. Background An adequate disaster preparation programme for nurses has not been developed in Taiwan. To develop an exhaustive and effective educational programme on disaster preparation for nurses, a multidimensional instrument is required for assessing the disaster preparation level of nurses. Design A cross‐sectional study was conducted. Methods In total, 1550 of 2226 public health nurses in 15 counties completed the self‐administrated questionnaire. We randomly selected 805 samples to examine the factor structure and factor model by using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The convergent validity was measured using the average variance extracted and composite reliability. Results Five factors, namely postdisaster management, skills, knowledge of self‐preparation in a disaster, knowledge to respond in the community, and knowledge to respond in the workplace, were extracted, and explained 65·13% of the total variance. An acceptable model fit was identified using confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool was 0·97. Significant values of the average variance extracted greater than 0·5 indicated convergent validity. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring disaster preparation. Relevance to clinical practice The Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool provides reliable and valid measures that can be used to evaluate the disaster preparedness of nurses. The items in the instrument can be used to identify the dimension of disaster management in all stages, and can form the essential foundation of an education and training programme for public health nurses to reduce the harm of disasters and promote community resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu‐Fei Chen & Kuei‐Ru Chou & Yuan‐Mei Liao & Cheng‐Hsun Ho & Min‐Huey Chung, 2015. "Construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool in Taiwan," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 1132-1143, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:1132-1143
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12721
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaelim Lee & Kyeong-Yae Sohng, 2020. "Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Korean Version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:7-8:p:1132-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.