IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i3-4p523-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of the quality of Emergency Nurse Practitioner services for patients presenting with minor injuries to one rural urgent care centre in the UK: a descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Joe McDevitt
  • Vidar Melby

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the quality of the emergency nurse practitioner service provided to people presenting to a rural urgent care centre with minor injuries. The three objectives that were focused were an evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the emergency nurse practitioner service, an assessment of patients' satisfaction with the emergency nurse practitioner service and a determination of factors that may enhance the quality of the emergency nurse practitioner service. Background Urgent care centres have become increasingly prevalent across the UK. Emergency nurse practitioner services at these rural urgent care centres remain largely unevaluated. This study attempts to redress this deficit by evaluating the quality of an emergency nurse practitioner service in relation to the care of patients presenting with minor injuries to a rural urgent care centre. Design This descriptive study used a case‐note review and a survey design with one open‐ended exploratory question. Methods Patient views were collected using a self‐completed questionnaire and a data extraction tool to survey patients' case notes retrospectively. Results Despite comparatively low total length‐of‐stay times, most patients felt they had enough time to discuss things fully with the emergency nurse practitioner. Although emergency nurse practitioners routinely impart injury advice, feedback from some patients suggests a need for the provision of more in‐depth information regarding their injury. The vast majority (97·3%) of patients felt that the quality of the emergency nurse practitioner service was of a high standard. Contrary to some other studies, the findings in this study indicate that patient satisfaction is not influenced by waiting times. Conclusions Emergency nurse practitioners in rural urgent care centres have the potential to deliver a safe and effective quality service that is reflected in high levels of patient satisfaction. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides some evidence to support the continued expansion of the emergency nurse practitioner service in rural settings in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe McDevitt & Vidar Melby, 2015. "An evaluation of the quality of Emergency Nurse Practitioner services for patients presenting with minor injuries to one rural urgent care centre in the UK: a descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 523-535, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:523-535
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12639
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diane Fotheringham & Sarah Dickie & Mark Cooper, 2011. "The evolution of the role of the Emergency Nurse Practitioner in Scotland: a longitudinal study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(19‐20), pages 2958-2967, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:523-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.