IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i3-4p406-414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Person‐centred ward climate as experienced by mentally lucid residents in long‐term care facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Ådel Bergland
  • Dag Hofoss
  • Marit Kirkevold
  • Tove Vassbø
  • David Edvardsson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the content validity and reliability of the Person‐centred Climate Questionnaire‐Patient version in long‐term care facilities, to describe residents' perceptions of the extent to which their ward climate was person‐centred and to explore whether person‐centredness was associated with facility and resident characteristics, such as facility and ward size, having a sensory garden and having a primary caregiver. Background The importance of the physical environment to persons with dementia has been investigated. However, research is lacking regarding the extent to which mentally lucid residents experience their physical and psycho‐social ward climate as person‐centred and the factors influencing their experience. Design Cross‐sectional survey design. Methods The Person‐centred Climate Questionnaire–Patient version was translated into Norwegian with forward and backward translation. The content validity index for scales was assessed. The Person‐centred Climate Questionnaire –Patient version was completed by 145 mentally lucid residents in 17 Norwegian long‐term care facilities. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's α and item–total correlations. Test–retest reliability was assessed by paired samples t‐test and Spearman's correlation. To explore differences based on facility and resident characteristics, independent‐samples t‐test and one‐way anova were used. Results The content validity index for scales was satisfactory. The Person‐centred Climate Questionnaire–Patient version was internally consistent and had satisfactory test–retest reliability. The climate was experienced as highly person‐centred. No significant differences were found, except that residents in larger facilities experienced the climate as more person‐centred in relation to everyday activities (subscale 2) than residents in smaller facilities. Conclusion The Norwegian version of the Person‐centred Climate Questionnaire–Patient version can be regarded as reliable in a long‐term care facility context. Perceived degree of person‐centredness was not associated with facility or resident characteristics, such as the number of residents, having a sensory garden or knowing that one has a primary caregiver. Relevance to clinical practice A person‐centred climate can be attained in different kinds of long‐term care facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ådel Bergland & Dag Hofoss & Marit Kirkevold & Tove Vassbø & David Edvardsson, 2015. "Person‐centred ward climate as experienced by mentally lucid residents in long‐term care facilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 406-414, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:406-414
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12614
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Edvardsson & Per‐Olof Sandman & Birgit Rasmussen, 2012. "Forecasting the ward climate: a study from a dementia care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 1136-1114, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ching‐Yuan Huang & Rhay‐Hung Weng & Tsung‐Chin Wu & Ching‐Tai Hsu & Chiu‐Hsia Hung & Yu‐Chen Tsai, 2020. "The impact of person‐centred care on job productivity, job satisfaction and organisational commitment among employees in long‐term care facilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2967-2978, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Digby & Susan Lee & Allison Williams, 2017. "The experience of people with dementia and nurses in hospital: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1152-1171, May.
    2. Mirre den Ouden & Sandra M. G. Zwakhalen & Judith M. M. Meijers & Michel H. C. Bleijlevens & Jan P. H. Hamers, 2019. "Feasibility of DAIly NURSE: A nursing intervention to change nursing staff behaviour towards encouraging residents’ daily activities and independence in the nursing home," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 801-813, March.
    3. Sandra Pennbrant & Cecilia Hjorton & Caroline Nilsson & Margareta Karlsson, 2020. "“The challenge of joining all the pieces together” – Nurses’ experience of palliative care for older people with advanced dementia living in residential aged care units," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3835-3846, October.
    4. Kristin Mjelde Helleberg & Solveig Hauge, 2014. "“Like a Dance”: Performing Good Care for Persons with Dementia Living in Institutions," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-7, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:406-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.