IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i23-24p3449-3458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of individualised intervention on older residents with constipation in nursing home: a randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu‐Ting Huang
  • Shu‐Di Yang
  • Yu‐Hsia Tsai
  • Yen‐Fan Chin
  • Bi‐Hwa Wang
  • Pei‐Kwei Tsay

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and examine the effectiveness of individualised intervention to reduce constipation among older adults in nursing homes. Background In long‐term care facilities, approximately 60–80% of the residents have symptoms of constipation. Constipation may lead to haemorrhoids, faecal impaction, ulcers, intestinal bleeding and can also lead to a decrease in quality of life. Although a high prevalence of constipation in older adults can be seen, there is a lack of empirical evidence for delivering interventions based on individual risk factors of constipation. Many factors cause constipation but the risk factors are different for each individual. Design A prospective, randomised control trial conducted in northern Taiwan. Methods Nursing home residents (n = 43) were randomly assigned to either the control group or the experimental group. The control group received no extra care from the researcher while the experimental group received an individualised intervention and an eight‐week follow‐up. Participants were assessed using the Bristol Stool Form Scale, the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms, types and dosages of laxative, and bowel sound observations. Data were taken at baseline, four weeks as well as eight weeks after the intervention. Results The participants in the experimental group had a significantly higher increase in the frequency of defecation (group effect, p = 0·029) and in bowel sounds (interaction effect, p = 0·010) compared to those in the control group. However, the two groups did not differ significantly in symptoms and the severity of the constipation symptoms, Bristol Stool Form and use of laxatives. Conclusions The results of this trial suggest that the individualised intervention may be appropriate for decreasing constipation among nursing home residents and encourage further study and confirmation. Relevance to clinical practice Using individualised intervention to enhance the self‐care ability related to constipation among older adults is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu‐Ting Huang & Shu‐Di Yang & Yu‐Hsia Tsai & Yen‐Fan Chin & Bi‐Hwa Wang & Pei‐Kwei Tsay, 2015. "Effectiveness of individualised intervention on older residents with constipation in nursing home: a randomised controlled trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3449-3458, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3449-3458
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12974
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahinur Durmuş İskender & Nurcan Çalışkan, 2022. "Effect of Acupressure and Abdominal Massage on Constipation in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(3), pages 453-462, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3449-3458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.