IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i19-20p2835-2848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing staffs' emotional well‐being and caring behaviours

Author

Listed:
  • Navtej Chana
  • Paul Kennedy
  • Zoë J Chessell

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the relationships between structural factors (work stressors), individual factors (demographics and the personal resources of resilience and social support) and transactional factors (appraisals and coping), and nursing staffs' levels of burnout, psychological distress and caring behaviours. A further aim was to examine the relationships between nursing staffs' levels of burnout and psychological distress and their caring behaviours. Background Burnout and psychological distress levels have been found to be high in National Health Service nursing staff and furthermore this emotional distress has been found to affect patient care. In a National Health Service striving to provide high‐quality patient‐centred care, it is essential that factors affecting nursing staffs' well‐being and their caring behaviours are examined. Design A cross‐sectional correlation‐based survey design. Methods A sample of 102 nursing staff from an Acute National Health Service Trust were recruited in 2010. Participants completed the questionnaires: Nursing Stress Scale, Social Support Questionnaire‐Short Form, Connor and Davidson Resilience Scale‐2, Occupational Coping Self‐Efficacy Scale for Nurses, PsychNurse Scale, Maslach Burnout Inventory, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Caring Behaviours Inventory‐revised. Due to the nonparametric nature of part of the data, Spearman's Rho correlations were used for analysis. Results Demographics were not found to be regularly correlated with nursing staffs' burnout, psychological distress or caring behaviours. Work stressors, coping strategies and self‐efficacy were found to be significantly correlated with nursing staffs' burnout and psychological distress. Caring behaviours were also correlated with coping strategies and self‐efficacy. Importantly, correlations were found between caring behaviours and nursing staffs' burnout and psychological distress. Conclusion It is extremely important that the emotional well‐being of nursing staff is supported, both for them, and for the effect this has on patient care. Action points are suggested for National Health Service employers to enable this to happen. Relevance to clinical practice To address the poor emotional well‐being found, it is suggested that changes are needed within current clinical practice, for example through provision of enhanced training, use of model‐based clinical supervision and reviews conducted on staffing levels and workload issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Navtej Chana & Paul Kennedy & Zoë J Chessell, 2015. "Nursing staffs' emotional well‐being and caring behaviours," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2835-2848, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:2835-2848
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12891
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan der Kinderen & Amber Valk & Svetlana N. Khapova & Maria Tims, 2020. "Facilitating Eudaimonic Well-Being in Mental Health Care Organizations: The Role of Servant Leadership and Workplace Civility Climate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Natura Colomer-Pérez & Elena Chover-Sierra & Vicente Gea-Caballero & Joan J. Paredes-Carbonell, 2020. "Health Assets, Vocation and Zest for Healthcare Work. A Salutogenic Approach to Active Coping among Certified Nursing Assistant Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:2835-2848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.