IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i19-20p2788-2796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardised care plans for in hospital stroke care improve documentation of health care assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrika Pöder
  • Marie Fogelberg Dahm
  • Nina Karlsson
  • Barbro Wadensten

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare stroke unit staff members' documentation of care in line with evidence‐based guidelines pre‐ and postimplementation of a multi‐professional, evidence‐based standardised care plan for stroke care in the electronic health record. Background Rapid and effective measures for patients with stroke or suspected stroke can limit the extent of damage; it is imperative that patients be observed, assessed and treated in accordance with evidence‐based practice in hospital. Design Quantitative, comparative. Methods Structured retrospective health record reviews were made prior to (n 60) and one and a half years after implementation (n 60) of a multi‐professional evidence‐based standardised care plan with a quality standard for stroke care in the electronic health record. Results Significant improvements were found in documentation of assessed vital signs, except for body temperature, Day 1 post compared with preimplementation. Documentation frequency regarding body temperature Day 1 and blood pressure and pulse Day 2 decreased post compared with preimplementation. Improvements were also detected in documented observations of patients' micturition capacity, swallowing capacity and mouth status and the proportion of physiotherapist‐documented aid assessments. Observations of blood glucose, mobilisation ability and speech and communication ability were unchanged. Conclusions An evidence‐based standardised care plan in an electronic health record assists staff in improving documentation of health status assessments during the first days after a stroke diagnosis. Relevance to clinical practice Use of a standardised care plan seems to have the potential to help staff adhere to evidence‐based patient care and, thereby, to increase patient safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrika Pöder & Marie Fogelberg Dahm & Nina Karlsson & Barbro Wadensten, 2015. "Standardised care plans for in hospital stroke care improve documentation of health care assessments," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2788-2796, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:2788-2796
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12874
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ting‐Ting Lee, 2006. "Nurses’ perceptions of their documentation experiences in a computerized nursing care planning system," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(11), pages 1376-1382, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:19-20:p:2788-2796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.