IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i17-18p2522-2528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' experiences of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Fredric Sjöberg
  • Emil Schönning
  • Martin Salzmann‐Erikson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the nurses' experiences of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units. Background Research in the area of resuscitation is primarily concentrated on medical and biophysical aspects. The subjective experiences of those who perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation and their emotions are more seldom addressed. Design Qualitative descriptive design. Methods Qualitative semi‐structured interviews were used (n = 8). Data were analysed with content analysis. Results Three categories describe the experiences of nurses: training and precardiopulmonary resuscitation; chaos and order during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; and debriefing postcardiopulmonary resuscitation. The study results indicate that the health care staff find it necessary to practice cardiopulmonary resuscitation, as it provides them with a basic feeling of security when applying it in actual situations. Conclusion We argue that postcardiopulmonary resuscitation debriefing must be viewed in the light of its eigenvalue with a specific focus on the staff's experiences and emotions, and not only on the intention of identifying errors. Relevance to clinical practice Debriefing is of the utmost importance for the nurses. Clinical leaders may make use of the findings of this study to introduce debriefing forums as a possible standard clinical procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredric Sjöberg & Emil Schönning & Martin Salzmann‐Erikson, 2015. "Nurses' experiences of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2522-2528, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2522-2528
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12844
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2522-2528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.