IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i9-10p1354-1364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating a novel approach to enhancing dysphagia management: workplace‐based, blended e‐learning

Author

Listed:
  • Irene Ilott
  • Bev Bennett
  • Kate Gerrish
  • Sue Pownall
  • Amanda Jones
  • Andrew Garth

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the learning effect and resource use cost of workplace‐based, blended e‐learning about dysphagia for stroke rehabilitation nurses. Background Dysphagia is a potentially life‐threatening problem that compromises quality of life. In many countries, nurses play a crucial role in supporting the management of patients with swallowing problems, yet the literature reports a need for training. Design A single‐group, pre‐ and post‐study with mixed methods. Methods Each blended e‐learning session comprised a needs analysis, e‐learning programmes, practical skills about modifying fluids and action planning to transfer learning into practice. Participants were the population of registered nurses (n = 22) and healthcare assistants (n = 10) on a stroke rehabilitation ward in a large, teaching hospital in England between August 2010–March 2011. Data collection comprised observation (34 hours), questionnaires administered at four time points to examine change in attitude, knowledge and practice, and estimating the resource use cost for the service. Nonparametric tests and content analysis were used to analyse the data. Results All participants achieved a nationally recognised level of competence. The learning effect was evident on the post‐ and follow‐up measures, with some items of dysphagia knowledge and attitude achieving significance at the p ≤ 0·05 level. The most common self‐reported changes in practice related to medicines management, thickening fluids and oral hygiene. The resource use cost was estimated at £2688 for 108 hours training. Conclusions Workplace‐based, blended e‐learning was an acceptable, cost effective way of delivering essential clinical knowledge and skills about dysphagia. Relevance to clinical practice Dysphagia should be viewed as a patient safety issue because of the risks of malnutrition, dehydration and aspiration pneumonia. As such, it is pertinent to many members of the interdisciplinary team. Consideration should be given to including dysphagia management in initial education and continuing professional development programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene Ilott & Bev Bennett & Kate Gerrish & Sue Pownall & Amanda Jones & Andrew Garth, 2014. "Evaluating a novel approach to enhancing dysphagia management: workplace‐based, blended e‐learning," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1354-1364, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1354-1364
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12409
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jane M Garcia & Edgar Chambers IV & Megan Clark & Jennifer Helverson & Ziad Matta, 2010. "Quality of care issues for dysphagia: modifications involving oral fluids," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1618-1624, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1354-1364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.