IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i9-10p1323-1331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New tool for patient evaluation of nurse practitioner in primary care settings

Author

Listed:
  • Zalika Klemenc‐Ketis
  • Andrej Kravos
  • Tonka Poplas‐Susič
  • Igor Švab
  • Janko Kersnik

Abstract

Aims and objectives To validate a tool for patient evaluation of nurse practitioners. Background The roles of nurse practitioners in family practice settings are health promotion and routine follow‐up of patients with chronic diseases. So far, several tools for patient evaluation of nurse practitioners have been developed. They revealed several dimensions of nurse practitioners' work and high levels of patient satisfaction with their work. The studies also reported conflicting data on the associations between demographic and other variables and the level of nurse practitioners' evaluation by patients. Design A cross‐sectional study. Methods This study was performed in a sample of seven model family medicine practices in Slovenia. We included 30 consecutive adult patients in each model family practice aiming at the final sample of 210 respondents. Patient evaluation of nurse practitioners was assessed using a Nurse Practitioner Evaluation Scale. Results The response rate was 80·9%. Mean total score on Nurse Practitioner Evaluation Scale was 87·9 ± 12·4 points. Cronbach's alpha of Nurse Practitioner Evaluation Scale was 0·941. Factor analyses revealed three factors: clinical approach factor, comprehensive approach factor and patient‐centred approach factor. Conclusions Nurse Practitioner Evaluation Scale proved to be a reliable tool for patient evaluations of nurse practitioners in primary care settings. Nurse Practitioner Evaluation Scale can be used in terms of a whole scale as well as in terms of three separate subscales. Relevance to clinical practice This newly developed tool can be used to monitor quality performance of nurse practitioners and to plan quality improvement actions in nurse practitioners' performance in primary care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Zalika Klemenc‐Ketis & Andrej Kravos & Tonka Poplas‐Susič & Igor Švab & Janko Kersnik, 2014. "New tool for patient evaluation of nurse practitioner in primary care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1323-1331, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1323-1331
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klemenc-Ketis, Zalika & Petek, Davorina & Kersnik, Janko, 2012. "Association between family doctors’ practices characteristics and patient evaluation of care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 269-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zalika Klemenc‐Ketis & Alenka Terbovc & Bostjan Gomiscek & Janko Kersnik, 2015. "Role of nurse practitioners in reducing cardiovascular risk factors: a retrospective cohort study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3077-3083, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zalika Klemenc-Ketis & Irena Makivić & Antonija Poplas Susic, 2018. "The development and validation of a new interprofessional team approach evaluation scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1323-1331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.