IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i7-8p967-975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing effects of intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia and intravenous injection in patients who have undergone total hysterectomy

Author

Listed:
  • Sung‐Jung Hong
  • Eunjoo Lee

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare the effects of two pain management methods, intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia and conventional intravenous injection, in terms of pain level, adverse reactions experienced, nursing care time spent for pain management, satisfaction with pain management and total cost of pain management for patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy. Background Patient‐controlled intravenous analgesia has been used most commonly for management of postoperative pain. Although it can be very effective in management of postoperative pain, patients still complained of many adverse reactions. Design A quasi‐experimental study design was used. Methods Seventy female participants were recruited for each group and were randomly assigned to one of the pain management methods. Data regarding pain level, adverse reactions experienced and level of satisfaction with pain management methods during a 48‐hour postoperative period were collected. Calculation of cost for each pain management method was based on the cost of the device, drugs for both analgesics and antiemetics, and time spent by nurses for both pain management methods. Frequencies, percentages and means of the data were calculated, and chi‐squared test and t‐test were performed for homogeneity. Results Mean postoperative pain levels at 2, 6 and 12 hour were significantly lower in patients who used patient‐controlled analgesic compared with patients who received intravenous injection; however, after that, there was no significant difference between the two methods. The cost for pain management was much higher for patients who used patient‐controlled analgesic; however, satisfaction level with pain control was lower than that for patients who received intravenous injection. Conclusions For patients who underwent total hysterectomy, patient‐controlled analgesia was not cost‐effective for management of postoperative pain for 48 hour, compared with conventional intravenous injection. Relevance to clinical practice For nurses caring for patients with pain, adaptation of diverse methods of pain management that will increase patients' satisfaction with pain management as well as lower the cost and occurrence of adverse reactions should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung‐Jung Hong & Eunjoo Lee, 2014. "Comparing effects of intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia and intravenous injection in patients who have undergone total hysterectomy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 967-975, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:967-975
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12221
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:967-975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.