IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i3-4p461-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility of the theory of planned behavior to predict nursing staff blood pressure monitoring behaviours

Author

Listed:
  • Joan M Nelson
  • Paul F Cook
  • Jennifer C Ingram

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate constructs from the theory of planned behavior (TPB, Ajzen 2002) – attitudes, sense of control, subjective norms and intentions – as predictors of accuracy in blood pressure monitoring. Background Despite numerous initiatives aimed at teaching blood pressure measurement techniques, many healthcare providers measure blood pressures incorrectly. Design Descriptive, cohort design. Methods Medical assistants and licensed practical nurses were asked to complete a questionnaire on TPB variables. These nursing staff's patients had their blood pressures measured and completed a survey about techniques used to measure their blood pressure. We correlated nursing staff's responses on the TBP questionnaire with their intention to measure an accurate blood pressure and with the difference between their actual blood pressure measurement and a second measurement taken by a researcher immediately after the clinic visit. Patients' perceptions of MAs' and LPNs' blood pressure measurement techniques were examined descriptively. Results Perceived control and social norm predicted intention to measure an accurate blood pressure, with a negative relationship between knowledge and intention. Consistent with the TPB, intention was the only significant predictor of blood pressure measurement accuracy. Conclusions Theory of planned behavior constructs predicted the healthcare providers' intention to measure blood pressure accurately and intention predicted the actual accuracy of systolic blood pressure measurement. However, participants' knowledge about blood pressure measurement had an unexpected negative relationship with their intentions. Relevance to clinical practice These findings have important implications for nursing education departments and organisations which traditionally invest significant time and effort in annual competency training focused on knowledge enhancement by staff. This study suggests that a better strategy might involve efforts to enhance providers' intention to change, particularly by changing social norms or increasing perceived control of the behaviour by nursing staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan M Nelson & Paul F Cook & Jennifer C Ingram, 2014. "Utility of the theory of planned behavior to predict nursing staff blood pressure monitoring behaviours," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 461-470, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:461-470
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12183
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara J. O'Neill & Trudy Dwyer & Kerry Reid‐Searl & Lynne Parkinson, 2018. "Nursing staff intentions towards managing deteriorating health in nursing homes: A convergent parallel mixed‐methods study using the theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 992-1003, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:3-4:p:461-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.