IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i1-2p224-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Primary caregivers’ satisfaction with clinicians’ response to them as informal carers of young people with first‐episode psychosis: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Terence V McCann
  • Dan I Lubman
  • Eileen Clark

Abstract

Aim. To explore first‐time primary caregivers’ experience of the way mental health nurses and other mental health clinicians respond to them as carers of young people with first‐episode psychosis. Background. Caregivers have a key role in supporting family members/relatives with mental illness, but their contribution is undervalued frequently by mental health nurses and other mental health clinicians. Design. Qualitative interpretative phenomenological analysis. Method. A qualitative interpretative design was undertaken, using semi‐structured, audio‐recorded interviews. Twenty primary caregivers were recruited through Orygen Youth Health, a first‐episode psychosis centre in Melbourne. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to identify themes in the data. Results. Two competing themes were identified in the data, highlighting caregivers’ contrasting experience with mental health nurses and other mental health clinicians. First, most clinical staff were approachable and supportive. Second, several carers felt their contribution was undervalued by some clinical staff. This was as a consequence of being excluded from clinical deliberations because of clinical staffs’ concerns and young people’s requests about maintaining confidentiality regarding treatment, as well as carers feeling their role was not taken seriously by clinical staff. Conclusion. First‐time primary carers have positive and negative experiences with first‐episode psychosis mental health nurses and other clinicians, and these competing events are interrelated. Experiences are affected directly by the manner they are treated by clinical staff and this may, in turn, affect carers’ commitment to caring, the way they engage with clinical staff on subsequent occasions and towards the first‐episode psychosis service generally. Relevance to clinical practice. Greater appreciation is needed of the contribution, experience and difficulties caregivers encounter in their role and in engaging with mental health nurses and other clinicians. Additional training is required for clinical staff in family interventions and to familiarise them with legislation and mental health policies relating to carers.

Suggested Citation

  • Terence V McCann & Dan I Lubman & Eileen Clark, 2012. "Primary caregivers’ satisfaction with clinicians’ response to them as informal carers of young people with first‐episode psychosis: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1‐2), pages 224-231, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:1-2:p:224-231
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03836.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03836.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03836.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Terence V McCann & John Bamberg, 2016. "Carers of older adults' satisfaction with public mental health service clinicians: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1634-1643, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:1-2:p:224-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.