IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1413-1422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is anybody listening? A qualitative study of nurses’ reflections on practice

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Huntington
  • Jean Gilmour
  • Anthony Tuckett
  • Stephen Neville
  • Denise Wilson
  • Catherine Turner

Abstract

Aim and objectives. To explore nurses’ perceptions of the reality of practice based on data from the Nurses and Midwives e‐cohort Study which examined the workforce characteristics, work–life balance and health of nurses. Background. Recruitment and retention of the nursing workforce is of international concern as demands increase due to demographic changes, political pressure and community expectations, in a climate of economic constraint. Design. Qualitative analysis of data from a cohort of Australian, New Zealand and UK nurses. Method. Of the 7604 participants in the electronic cohort, 1909 provided qualitative comments of which 162 related to nursing practice; thematic analysis resulted in four high order themes. The analytical discussion is structured around ‘care’ as the organising construct. Results. Four themes emerged: ‘embodied care’ which discusses the impact of work on the nurse’s physical and emotional health; ‘quantity/quality care’ which addresses increasing pressures of work and ability to provide quality care; ‘organisational (non)care’ raising the seeming lack of support from management; and ‘(un)collegial/self care’ where bullying and professional relationships were raised. Conclusions. Issues raised by participants have been discussed in the nursing literature for several years yet nurses still experience these negative aspects of nursing. It appears there is a significant gap between what is known about the practice environment, recommendations for change and change occurring: the management equivalent of the theory–practice gap, resulting in nurses intending to leave the profession. Relevance to clinical practice. Research demonstrates that a well‐qualified, stable nursing workforce improves quality of health care and health outcomes. Changing the work environment and fostering a positive workplace culture seems fundamental to supporting the retention of nurses, that this is not occurring in some areas in the current climate is a concern for the profession and those responsible for the provision of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Huntington & Jean Gilmour & Anthony Tuckett & Stephen Neville & Denise Wilson & Catherine Turner, 2011. "Is anybody listening? A qualitative study of nurses’ reflections on practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1413-1422, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1413-1422
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03602.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03602.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03602.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lars Louis Andersen & Jonas Vinstrup & Ebbe Villadsen & Kenneth Jay & Markus Due Jakobsen, 2019. "Physical and Psychosocial Work Environmental Risk Factors for Back Injury among Healthcare Workers: Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1413-1422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.